Skip to content
Canadian charities

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

Fondation ATURA

Le but de la fondation est de bâtir un capital et d'utiliser les revenus gagnés sur ce capital afin de faire des dons à des donataires reconnus dans les domaines de la santé éducation et la lutte contre la pauvreté.

C$793k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k6 grants · C$25k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$75k
  • C$50k–250k6 grants · C$693k
C$25,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAIDEC$150,000
FONDATION DUFRESNE & GAUTHIERC$150,000
ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONC$142,553
FONDATION DU COLLÈGE FRANÇOIS DE LAVALC$100,000
FONDATION DE L'ÉCOLE DES URSULINES DE QUÉBECC$100,000
B2TENC$50,000
CORPORATION SPORTS-QUÉBECC$40,000
FONDATION SABSAC$25,000
FONDATION DU JUVÉNAT DE NOTRE-DAMEC$10,000
FONDATION PORTAGEC$5,000
THÉÂTRE LE DIAMANTC$5,000
PRODUCTION LES GROS BECSC$5,000
FONDATION MADELI-AIDEC$5,000
INDICE D'HUMANITÉC$3,000
FONDATION SUR LE POINTE DES PIEDSC$2,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 82% of grant dollars (C$1.3M). The 18% that went abroad (C$289k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 18% of all-years giving (C$289k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$289k · 2 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.3M · 10 repeat orgsC$264k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

C$1.3M
C$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+8%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$208k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FONDATION DUFRESNE & GAUTHIER
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$375k · revenue +507%
  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'ÉCOLE DES URSULINES DE QUÉBEC
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$300k · revenue +85% · 41% of their budget
  • FS
    FONDATION SABSA
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$50k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • NJ
    NEUCHATEL JUNIOR COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$20k · revenue +84%
  • FD
    FONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À CHICOUTIMI
    one grant, 2023 · C$15k · revenue +20%
  • FJ
    FONDATION JEUNES EN TETE
    one grant, 2023 · C$9k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
2
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—
3
Fondation du Cégep de Trois-Rivières
—
4
Fondation Richelieu Saint-Jean

Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse

—
5
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
6
La Fondation du Cégep de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue

Bourses d'études acquisition d'équipements technologiques développement de projets structurants avancement de l'éducation fonds recherche et développement.

—
7
Fondation universitaire de l'école des hautes études commerciales de Montréal
—
8
Fondation Educative Jean-Jacques-Bertrand

Campagne de financement et souper bénéfice

—
9
Fondation Jean-Louis Tasse

Dons à des écoles et universités

—
10
Fondation Collège Laval

Nous appuyons financièrement des enfants provenant de familles éprouvant des difficultés financiéres temporaires ou de longue durée afin d'offrir à un plus grand nombre d'enfants la possibilité de poursuivre leurs études secondaires au…

—
11
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
12
Fondation de L'Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement de la recherche et des services à la collectivité de l'université du québec à trois-rivières ainsi que remettre des bourses aux étudiants. dons accessibles aux étudiants et aux…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fondation De L'universite Du Quebec a Chicoutimi Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Productions Les Gros Becs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION DUFRESNE & GAUTHIER — C$375,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetFONDATION DE L'ÉCOLE DES URSULINES DE QUÉBEC — C$300,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetFONDATION DU COLLÈGE FRANÇOIS DE LAVAL — C$200,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetCENTRAIDE — C$150,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFONDATION SABSA — C$50,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetNEUCHATEL JUNIOR COLLEGE — C$20,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetFONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À CHICOUTIMI — C$14,999 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHÉÂTRE LE DIAMANT — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION MADELI-AIDE — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPRODUCTION LES GROS BECS — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION DU JUVÉNAT DE NOTRE-DAME — C$10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFONDATION JEUNES EN TETE — C$8,850 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION PORTAGE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DE L'HOPITAL DE MATANE — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFONDATION SUR LA POINTE DES PIEDS — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBISHOP UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORCHESTRE SYMPHONIQUE DE QUÉBEC — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU GRAND DÉFI PIERRE LAVOIE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCITÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE LAVAL — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Virginia Parker Found…Fondation Québec Phil…Conam Charitable Foun…Centraide Québec Cha…Fondation FrontenacJewish Community Foun…Fondation Famille God…Wcpd FoundationFondation Henrichon-G…Soeurs de Saint-Franç…Fondation DesjardinsLa Fondation du Grand…
Virginia Parker FoundationQC13.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Virginia Parker Foundation · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Conam Charitable Foundation · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Fondation Frontenac · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Famille Godin - Godin Family Foundation · Wcpd Foundation · Fondation Henrichon-Goulet · Soeurs de Saint-François-D'Assise Du Canada · Fondation Desjardins · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 780281002:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation ATURA’s filings →