Mirabel, QC · Public foundation
Fondation Allaire
L'organisme a versé des contributions à des organismes de bienfaisance et de charité ou similaire de la région des Laurentides.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATIONÉDOUARD ET SES ÉTOILES | C$6,295 |
| FONDATION AUTISME LAURENTIDES | C$700 |
| FONDATION LE BERLINGOT - AIDE ALIMENTAIRE AUX ENFANTS DES ÉC | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +104% since the first grant, against +57% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FAFONDATION AUTISME LAURENTIDES3× · 2017–2019 · C$76k · revenue +104%
- FÉFONDATION ÉDOUARD ET SES ÉTOILES2× · 2018–2019 · C$31k · revenue -100% · 93% of their budget
- LBLE BERLINGOT, LA FONDATION POUR L'AIDE ALIMENTAIRE AUX ENFAN2× · 2017–2019 · C$5k · revenue +208%
Funded once
- FPFONDATION PALLIA-VIEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$291k · revenue +63% · 38% of their budget
- FDFONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL RÉGIONAL DE SAINT-JÉRÔME INC.one grant, 2017 · C$100k · revenue -33%
- FRFONDATION RICHELIEU ST-JÉRÔME INC.graduatedone grant, 2017 · C$4k · revenue +57%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse
La fondation amasse des fonds par le biais de souscriptions régulières et d'activités de financement. elle verse les sommes récoltées à des donataires reconnus qui respectent les buts de la fondaiton soit: aider financièrement les…
Faire des dons à des organismes oeuvrant auprès de la jeunesse et des familles.
Chaute- jeunes
Recevoir des dons ou legs pour les fins particulières du cmsss d'argenteuil dans le but d'aider d'établissement dans la réalisation de sa mission - organiser des campagnes de souscription et solliciter des dons en faveur du cmsss…
Recueillir des fonds pour l'autisme et autres troubles envahissants du développement
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Richelieu St-Jérome Inc. and the most unlike its peers is C.E.S.a.M.E Centre pour l'enfance en santé mentale Deux-Montagnes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FONDATION PALLIA-VIE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL RÉGIONAL DE SAINT-JÉRÔME INC. ↗
- Who funds FONDATION AUTISME LAURENTIDES ↗
- Who funds FONDATION ÉDOUARD ET SES ÉTOILES ↗
- Who funds LE BERLINGOT, LA FONDATION POUR L'AIDE ALIMENTAIRE AUX ENFAN ↗
- Who funds FONDATION RICHELIEU ST-JÉRÔME INC. ↗
- Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA SCLÉROSE EN PLAQUES ↗
- Who funds CESAME-CENTRE POUR L'ENFANCE EN SANTÉ MENTALE DEUX-MONTAGNES ↗
- Who funds GARDE MANGER DES PAYS D'EN HAUT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.