Baie-Comeau, QC · Public foundation
Fondation Abitibi Consolidated - Manicouagan
Encourager et soutenir le travail caritatif de toute nature
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k6 grants · C$26k
- C$10k–50k4 grants · C$100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARC NATURE POINTE-AUX-OUTARDES | C$46,754 |
| COMPTOIR ALIMENTAIRE L'ESCALE | C$32,000 |
| CENTRAIDE | C$11,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$10,000 |
| ÉCOLE DE MUSIQUE COTE NORD | C$6,500 |
| FONDATION DU CENTRE DE SANTÉ ET DE SERVICES SOCIAUX DE MANIC | C$5,680 |
| DÉPANNAGE DE L'ANSE | C$5,000 |
| MAISON DES FAMILLES | C$5,000 |
| FONDATION DU CÉPEG DE BAIE-COMEAU | C$2,758 |
| ÉCCOLE SECONDAIRE SERGE BOUCHARD | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PNPARC NATURE POINTE-AUX-OUTARDES5× · 2020–2024 · C$217k · revenue +20%
- CACOMPTOIR ALIMENTAIRE L'ESCALE5× · 2020–2024 · C$124k · revenue +109%
- CCENTRAIDE5× · 2020–2024 · C$71k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- CDCÉGEP DE BAIE-COMEAUone grant, 2023 · C$25k · revenue +7%
- AMACCEUIL MARIE-DE-L'INCARNATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$10k · revenue +27%
- CFCARREFOUR FAMILIAL DE CHUTES-AUX-OUTARDESgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$6k · revenue +181%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Halte garderie aide aux devoirs visites à domicile dépannage alimentaire cafés rencontres atelier de francisation camp de jour estival
Dons de paniers de provisions vente de vêtements et meubles à prix réduits pour venir en aide aux plus défavorisés. aide aux sinistrés (exemple: inondation)
Service de dépannage service de maintien a domicile
Offre en location des ogements à des familles monoparentales à faible ou modest revenu. - offre aux femmes monoparentales et à leur enfants un lieu de support et d'entraide -offre un service de halte garderie lord des activités
Ventes de vetements usagé aude aux personnes et aux familles démunies
Soirée ventes de repas bazard et autre
Accueuil. écoute nfo-référence accompagnement
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maison des familles de Baie-Comeau and the most unlike its peers is Parc Nature de Pointe-aux-Outardes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARC NATURE POINTE-AUX-OUTARDES ↗
- Who funds COMPTOIR ALIMENTAIRE L'ESCALE ↗
- Who funds CENTRAIDE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DU CÉGEP DE BAIE-COMEAU ↗
- Who funds CÉGEP DE BAIE-COMEAU ↗
- Who funds MAISON DES FAMILLES BAIE-COMEAU ↗
- Who funds VALLÉE DES ROSEAUX ↗
- Who funds RÉSIDENCE ST-JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds ÉCOLE DE MUSIQUE COTE NORD ↗
- Who funds DÉPANNAGE DE L'ANSE ↗
- Who funds ACCEUIL MARIE-DE-L'INCARNATION ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DU CENTRE DE SANTÉ ET DE SERVICES SOCIAUX DE MANIC ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION SCOLAIRE DE L'ESTUAIRE POLY DES BAIES ↗
- Who funds CARREFOUR FAMILIAL DE CHUTES-AUX-OUTARDES ↗
- Who funds MAISON ANITA LEBEL ↗
- Who funds MAISON DES FEMMES ↗
- Who funds LES AMIS DE BOISÉ DE LA POINTE ST-GILLES ↗
- Who funds LA MAISON DES JEUNES LA RELÈVE ↗
- Who funds LÉGION ROYALE CANADIENNE ↗
- Who funds FABRIQUE ST-ÉTIENNE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Centraide Haute-Cote-Nord / Manicouagan · Fondation Bon Départ de Canadian Tire du Québec Inc. · TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur Meilleur · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.