Waterdown, ON · Charitable organization
Flamborough Christian Fellowship
Sunday meetings of worship teaching and prayer ministry as well as various other meetings with the same focus during the week.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Elim Fellowship Canada | C$6,220 |
| Della Tyrrell Ministries | C$2,400 |
| Mission Revival International | C$1,800 |
| Greater Ontario House of Prayer | C$1,200 |
| Youth for Christ | C$500 |
| Living Rock Ministries | C$500 |
| Atwell Centre | C$500 |
| Evangelical Fellowship of Canada | C$300 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MRMISSION REVIVAL CHURCH INTERNATIONAL7× · 2018–2024 · C$24k · revenue +90% · 28% of their budget
- GRGoshen Renewal Ministries6× · 2017–2022 · C$14k · revenue +28%
- YFYouth for Christ8× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- HOHouse of Hope Societyone grant, 2017 · C$250 · revenue -22% · 60% of their budget
- GVGrand Valley Christian Centregraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$120 · revenue ×31
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To encourage and equip people who already have a relationship with jesus christ and also bring those who do not know jesus christ to an understanding of who he is.
Weekly worship services bible studies and small groups. missionary organizations evangelism
Mission services - outreach meals and feeding programs Church services - congregation meetings place of worship bible study shower facility youth outreach
Church fellowship of believers who worship together and strive to reach others with the gospel of jesus christ.
Evangelical ministry
Bible study prayer meeting outreach
Publishing missionary organizations evangelism social outreach religious fellowship
Evagelism break through prayer services bible study women's group fellowship seniors outreach christmas outreach young adult fellowship
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
We provide weekly worship experiences for all ages. we provide prayer and pastoral care as well as spiritual counsel to individuals and families. we minister to people in need in our community also partner with church planting…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Ontario House of Prayer (Gohop) and the most unlike its peers is Atwell Centre: Pregnancy Options Support. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Elim Fellowship ↗
- Who funds MISSION REVIVAL CHURCH INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Della Tyrrell Ministries ↗
- Who funds Goshen Renewal Ministries ↗
- Who funds Youth for Christ ↗
- Who funds Living Rock Ministries ↗
- Who funds Greater Ontario House of Prayer ↗
- Who funds EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES ↗
- Who funds Atwell Centre ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CHURCH ↗
- Who funds House of Hope Society ↗
- Who funds Grand Valley Christian Centre ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Golden Rain Fellowship · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.