Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Chicoutimi, QC · Charitable organization

Fjord Jeunesse Inc.

I ’organisme fjord jeunesse inc poursuit des fins de concertation de approchement intergénérationnel et de support financier pour des projets impliquant de jeunes adultes ( 18-35 ans) du saguenay lac-st-jean dans une perspective d’éveil spiritual

C$5k
Granted FY2018
7
Grants FY2018
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$700
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
C.E.C.R. DE CHICOUTIMIC$1,450
CAB DE CHICOUTIMIC$785
Individual grant recipientC$750
INSTITUTE DE FONDATION THÉOLOGIQUEC$700
FONDATION DE L'ODYSSÉE LAFONTAINEC$500
FAMILLE MYRIAMC$500
C.D.P.E.C.C$300
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$5k · 3 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
1

Total granted

C$5k
C$900

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    C.E.C.R. DE CHICOUTIMI
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue -41%
  • ID
    INSTITUTE DE FONDATION THÉOLOGIQUE
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k · revenue -84%
  • FM
    FAMILLE MYRIAM
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k · revenue -15%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · C$900

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/5
Grantees still filing
1/5
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetC.E.C.R. DE CHICOUTIMI — C$2,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE DE FONDATION THÉOLOGIQUE — C$1,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILLE MYRIAM — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCAB DE CHICOUTIMI — C$785 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetC.D.P.E.C. — C$300 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2021) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 824028948:2018-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fjord Jeunesse’s filings →