Burlington, ON · Charitable organization
First Community Church of Milton
Sunday church services at a local long care facility for our members residents & their families.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHURCHILL COMMUNITY CHURCH OF ACTON | C$6,872 |
| THE CANADIAN RED CROSS ASSOCIATION | C$1,100 |
| TOWNSEND-SMITH FOUNDATION | C$1,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | C$1,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY OF MILTON | C$1,000 |
| CHILDREN BELIEVE | C$668 |
| THE WILLOW FOUNDATION | C$500 |
| MILTON TRANSITIONAL HOUSING | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TFTownsend-Smith Foundation3× · 2017–2019 · C$7k · revenue ×58
- TSThe Salvation Army of Milton3× · 2017–2019 · C$3k · revenue +867%
- WFWILLOW FOUNDATION-HALTON REGAN2× · 2018–2019 · C$1k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- MTMilton Transitional Housingone grant, 2017 · C$1k
- DWDoctors Without Bordersone grant, 2017 · C$1k
- DWDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERSone grant, 2018 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Donates funds and equipment to halton healthcare services corporation to benefit the milton hospital site.
To provide funding to women's college hospital.
The charity was established to exclusively to benefit charitable organizations and causes throughout the world
To support the haldimand war memorial hospital and other health providing facilities within the town of dunville
The foundation grants money to local community charities
The CMA Foundation provides impactful charitable giving to qualified donees to advance health equity and further excellence in health care. Grants from the CMA Foundation focus on supporting medical education physician wellness and…
Operates hospitals providing healthcare services to the towns of oakville milton & halton hills and their surrounding communities.
Provide grants and gifts of equipment to the oakville site of halton healthcare services corporation
Donates funds to halton healthcare services corporation to benefit the georgetown hospital site
Improve respiratory health through educational advancement of local healthcare providers worldwide.
Mission: to meet evolving local health care needs by partnering with community stakeholders.
To receive and maintain funds in order to make donations in part or in full to winchester district memorial hospital and rural healthcare innovations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Townsend Smith Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Children Believe Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Townsend-Smith Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHURCHILL COMMUNITY CHURCH OF ACTON ↗
- Who funds The Canadian Red Cross Soc. ↗
- Who funds The Salvation Army of Milton ↗
- Who funds WILLOW FOUNDATION-HALTON REGAN ↗
- Who funds DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN BELIEVE ↗
- Who funds Milton Area Christian Churches Working Together ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.