Skip to content

Chipman, NB · Charitable organization

First Chipman United Baptist Cemetery

1/1/22 to 4/3/22 worship service weekly.

C$255k
Granted FY2022
24
Grants FY2022
3
Regions reached
C$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under C$10k14 grants · C$70k
  • C$10k–50k10 grants · C$185k
C$5,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$245k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANGLOPHONE WEST SCHOOL DISTRICTC$30,000
HOSPICE FREDERICTONC$25,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALSC$25,000
CANADIAN RED CROSSC$25,000
I.W.K.C$25,000
CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETYC$15,000
CHALMERS HOSPITALC$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMYC$10,000
THE WAR AMPS OF CANADAC$10,000
ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION-VETERANSC$10,000
CHIPMAN YOUTH CENTRE INCC$5,000
CHIPMAN COMMUNITY CARE INCC$5,000
SUSSEX VALE TRANSITION HOUSEC$5,000
CHIPMAN PUBLIC LIBRARYC$5,000
GREEN HILL LAKE CAMPC$5,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 89% of grant dollars (C$235k). The 11% that went abroad (C$30k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 11% of all-years giving (C$30k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$32k · 9 repeat orgsC$233k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

C$32k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+40%

Still filing today

56%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$230k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CROSSWORLD
    4× · 2017–2022 · C$7k · revenue +21%
  • CC
    CHIPMAN COMMUNITY CARE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$6k · revenue +20% · 32% of their budget
  • FH
    FREDERICTON HOMELESS SHELTERS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$5k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • RO
    REACH ONE TOUCH ONE
    one grant, 2019 · C$607 · revenue +15%
  • C
    CROSSWORLDS
    one grant, 2019 · C$550
  • RO
    REACH ONE TOUCH ONE
    one grant, 2018 · C$420

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chip and Dale Homes Inc.

The company creates and manages family-like homes for adults with intellectual disabilities.

—
2
Chimo Community Services Society

Crisis lines nova transition house women's counselling children's counselling adult and youth counselling community engagement outreach and advocacy homeless prevention program settlement program.

—
3
Camp Tanner Inc.

Summer camp for children

—
4
Youth Resources Niagara Inc.

Community programs directed to youth crime prevention. operates as temporary custody facility. a second residential facility provides homes for family and children services. also a 24 month program initial in 2013 fiscal year designed to…

—
5
Graphite Bible Camp Inc.

Operates As A Summer Camp and Recreational Facility

—
6
Transition House Incorporated

Operated short-term support and rehabilitation program for men 16 years of age or more who have an addiction of some sort. mainly dealt with those who are chemically dependent or have gambling problems.

—
7
Child Lifeline Inc.

The organization provides children's hospice care.

—
8
Camp Cucumber

Operation of camp facility exclusively for the benefit of disadvantaged youth and their families through educational athletic artistic recreational and social activities.

—
9
Cambridge Shelter Corporation

Provides the following services to the homeless: overnght shelter transitional supportive housing medical services food clothing furniture. also provides a variety of programs including literacy counselling housing searcjes job searches.…

—
10
Camp Chamisall Society

Overnight camp programs for youth from grade 3 through grade 1

—
11
Crossman Ministries Corp.

Providing-facilities-for-job-training-and-life-skills-in-a-christian-environment-for-individuals-experiencing-difficulties-in-obtaining-employment-and-being-self-sufficient

—
12
Chisholm Services for Children

Provide long-term residential care for children and youth in nova scotia.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teen Challenge Canada Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Chipman Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WAR AMPS OF CANADA — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHALMERS HOSPITAL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROYAL CANADIAN LEGION-VETERANS — C$10,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetCROSSWORLD — C$6,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHIPMAN COMMUNITY CARE INC — C$5,600 over 5y, 32% of budgetFREDERICTON HOMELESS SHELTERS INC — C$5,400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHIPMAN COMMUNITY VAULT — C$5,400 over 5y, 11% of budgetCARE 'N' SHARE' INC — C$5,200 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCHIPMAN PUBLIC LIBRARY — C$5,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetMINTO COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTRE INC — C$5,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetSUSSEX VALE TRANSITION HOUSE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP WEGESESUM — C$5,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetCHIPMAN YOUTH CENTRE INC — C$5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetREACH ONE TOUCH ONE — C$607 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNorthern Canada Evangelical Missions — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN HILL LAKE CAMP — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeen Challenge — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN RED CROSS ↗
  • Who funds THE WAR AMPS OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY ↗
  • Who funds CHALMERS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION-VETERANS ↗
  • Who funds CROSSWORLD ↗
  • Who funds CHIPMAN COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREDERICTON HOMELESS SHELTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIPMAN COMMUNITY VAULT ↗
  • Who funds CARE 'N' SHARE' INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIPMAN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds MINTO COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTRE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSSEX VALE TRANSITION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP WEGESESUM ↗
  • Who funds CHIPMAN YOUTH CENTRE INC ↗
  • Who funds REACH ONE TOUCH ONE ↗
  • Who funds Northern Canada Evangelical Missions ↗
  • Who funds GREEN HILL LAKE CAMP ↗
  • Who funds Teen Challenge ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canada Donates Inc.NB12.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canada Donates Inc. · United Way/Centraide (Central N.B./Region Du Centre du N.B.)Inc. · Fredericton Community Foundation Inc. · Chipman Christian Life Center Inc. · Shoppers Foundation for Women's Health Fondation Pharmaprixpour la Santé des Femmes · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 118853548:2022-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on First Chipman United Baptist Cemetery’s filings →