Cambridge-Narrows, NB · Charitable organization
First Cambridge Baptist Church
Regular sunday church services
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONVENTION OF ATLANTIC BAPTIST CHURCHES | C$3,971 |
| UNITED BAPTIST WOMEN'S MISSIONARY UNION | C$2,134 |
| UNITED BAPTIST GREEN HILL LAKE CAMP | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- COCONVENTION OF ATLANTIC BAPTIST CHURCHES8× · 2017–2024 · C$20k · revenue -46%
- WMWOMEN'S MISSIONARY SOCIETY8× · 2017–2024 · C$13k
- UBUNITED BAPTIST GREEN HILL LAKE CAMP6× · 2017–2023 · C$5k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- APANGLICAN PARISH OF CAMBRIDGE-WATERBOROUGHone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue -32%
- CBCANADIAN BAPTIST MINISTRIES2× · 2017–2019 · C$80 · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.