Mississauga, ON · Charitable organization
Field Ministries International
FIELD MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL operates as promise of life church.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$18k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$22k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Field Ministries International Global Outreach | C$21,871 |
| Israel's Peace Ministries | C$8,396 |
| Oral Roberts Evangelistic Ministries | C$7,000 |
| Dufresne Ministries Canada | C$2,579 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$7k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- DMDUFRESNE MINISTRIES CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$484k · revenue +431% · 99% of their budget
- IPIsraels Peace Ministries7× · 2017–2024 · C$39k · revenue +16% · 33% of their budget
- FCFAITH CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA, INC4× · 2017–2020 · C$14k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- IAIMPACTING ASIA MINISTRIESone grant, 2021 · C$5k
- EMEVERYDAY MINISTRIES CANADAone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -3%
- WVWORLD VISIONone grant, 2020 · C$2k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Crusades and conferences teaching schools and gatherings throughout canada ministered in south korea indonesia taiwan and philippines
Crusades and evangelical outreach meetings
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
Lactures on biblical israel
Outreach conferences leadership development sharing the gospel
Kingdom culture ministries is an international ministry that is dedicated to bringing the delivering power of jesus christ throughout north america and abroad. to that end ministry personnel preached the gospel in churches conferences &…
A bible based ministry focused on worldwide evangelism undegirded by apologetics. aims to reach the opinion shapers of the culture and thereby influence the culture with the philisophical claims of the historic christian faith. speak in…
1. teaching and preaching 2. church planting 3. outreach 4. discipleship
Church activities with missionary outreach
Distributing the teaching content of dr. j. vernon mcgee in canada and throughout the world. this is accomplished through radio tv digital and social media platforms as well as through christians in various countries.
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
We held meetings for the body of Christ from different denominations to come together for Bible teaching and prayer in Canada as well as worldwide. The meetings are held in person and worldwide. Supporting outreach for Christ through…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Every Day Ministries Canada and the most unlike its peers is Israel's Peace Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DUFRESNE MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds JERRY SAVELLE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Field Ministries International Global Outreach ↗
- Who funds Israels Peace Ministries ↗
- Who funds IMPACTING ASIA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds FAITH CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA, INC ↗
- Who funds Oral Roberts Evangelistic Ministries ↗
- Who funds OPERATION MOBILIZATION CANADA ↗
- Who funds EVERYDAY MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LIFE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN CENTRE FOR CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.