Shawinigan, QC · Private foundation
Fiducie Testamentaire de la Fondation Marie-Marthe
Distritution des revenus net de la fondation à des oeuvres de charités et éducatives
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATION DE LA SSS DE L'ÉNERGIE | C$2,500 |
| FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL MAISONNEUVE-ROSEMONT | C$2,000 |
| LIBERTÉ EN PROFONDEUR CANADA | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +181% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FDFONDATION DE LA SSS DE L'ÉNERGIE4× · 2020–2023 · C$7k · revenue +200%
- CDCENTRE D'ENTRAIDE AUX RAYONS DU SOLEIL3× · 2019–2021 · C$6k · revenue +181%
- LELIBERTÉ EN PROFONDEUR CANADA4× · 2019–2023 · C$5k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- CÉCOMMUNAUTÉ ÉGLISE ST-PAULone grant, 2018 · C$5k
- ADASSOCIATION DES AUXILIAIRES BENEVOLES DU CENTRE HOSPITALIERone grant, 2019 · C$4k
- EDECOLE DE SKI VALLEE-DU-PARCone grant, 2019 · C$3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…
Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal
Organiser des levées de fonds pour acheter des équipements médicaux pour le cisss montérégie-est
La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal
Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…
Dons à des donataires reconnus
La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation de la santé et des services sociaux de l'Énergie and the most unlike its peers is Freedom At Depth Canada/Liberte En Profondeur Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FONDATION DE LA SSS DE L'ÉNERGIE ↗
- Who funds CENTRE D'ENTRAIDE AUX RAYONS DU SOLEIL ↗
- Who funds LIBERTÉ EN PROFONDEUR CANADA ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL MAISONNEUVE-ROSEMONT ↗
- Who funds OEUVRE CHARITABLE DES CHEVALIERS DE COLOMB DU QUEBEC INC. ↗
- Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER ↗
- Who funds LA CORPORATION DES TROIS COLOMBES (MAISON ALINE CHRETIEN) ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION DU COLLEGE SHAWINIGAN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.