Edmundston, NB · Charitable organization
Fiduciaires Des Oeuvres de Charite Du Club Richelieu - Edmundston
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| L'Atelier R.A.D.O. Inc. | C$9,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$5,000 |
| Association Scouts de Saint-Basile | C$1,500 |
| Fondation St-Louis Maillet | C$1,000 |
| Commission de la Bibliothèque Mgr Conway | C$1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$1,000 |
| Le Maillon | C$1,000 |
| Association D'Intégration Communautaire | C$1,000 |
| Salon du Livre Edmundston | C$1,000 |
| La Société des Jeux de L'acadie | C$500 |
| Mouvement Scout St-Jacques | C$500 |
| Fondation Hôpital Régional Edmundston | C$200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 71% of grant dollars (C$53k). The 29% that went abroad (C$22k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 29% of all-years giving (C$22k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LRL'Atelier R.A.D.O. Inc.5× · 2017–2024 · C$16k · revenue +88%
- LML'ESCALE MADAVIC5× · 2017–2022 · C$7k · revenue +232%
- VDVILLAGES DES SOURCES RESMAVIC5× · 2017–2022 · C$6k · revenue +135%
Funded once
- LRL'ATELIER R.A.D.O. INCone grant, 2023 · C$3k
- FEFONDATION ESCALE MADAVICone grant, 2023 · C$2k
- LPLES P'TITS VIOLON MGR LIONEL DAIGLEone grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue -82%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Vente de vêtements et d'articles usagés
Soulagement de la pauvreté des jeunes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation de l'Hôpital régional d'Edmundston Inc. Edmundston Regional Hospital Foundation Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Commission De La Bibliotheque Publique Mgr W J Conway D'edmundston. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds L'Atelier R.A.D.O. Inc. ↗
- Who funds L'ESCALE MADAVIC ↗
- Who funds VILLAGES DES SOURCES RESMAVIC ↗
- Who funds PARRAINAGE TIERS MOJNDE ↗
- Who funds Fondatio du Richelieu International ↗
- Who funds Fondation St-Louis Maillet ↗
- Who funds Commission de la Bibliothèque Mgr Conway ↗
- Who funds La Société des Jeux de L'Acadie ↗
- Who funds FOI ET LUMIÈRE ↗
- Who funds Fondation Hôpital Régional Edmundston ↗
- Who funds LES P'TITS VIOLON MGR LIONEL DAIGLE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DES OEUVRES DE L'HÔTEL DIEU SAINT-BASILE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: La Congrégation des Soeurs Maristes / Congregation of the Marist Sisters · Les Religieuses Hospitalieres de Saint Joseph de la Provincede Notre-Dame de L'Assomption · United Way/Centraide (Central N.B./Region Du Centre du N.B.)Inc. · Filles de la Sagesse du Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.