Skip to content

Fenwick, ON · Charitable organization

Fenwick United Church

We are an all inclusive christian congregation providing weekly services and pastoral care for our members adherents and the community at large including hospitals long term care and retirement homes.

C$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k15 grants · C$19k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$750
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA MISSION & SERVICE FUNDC$10,300
CAVE SPRINGS CAMPC$7,294
PELHAM CARESC$3,260
BIRCHWAY NIAGARAC$1,000
CANADIAN FOODGRAINS BANKC$1,000
THE RAFTC$880
ROSE CITY KIDSC$750
ANGOLA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIPC$750
WELLSPRING NIAGARAC$750
CANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION NIAGARA BRANCHC$500
CANADIAN RED CROSS (FIRE RELIEF)C$500
NIAGARA NUTRITION PARTNERSC$500
HOSPICE NIAGARAC$500
HOPE CENTREC$500
FACS NIAGARA FOUNDATIONC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$159k · 25 repeat orgsC$7k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
12

Total granted

C$159k
C$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+59%

Still filing today

60%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$697 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CAVE SPRINGS CAMP
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$16k · revenue +238%
  • PC
    PELHAM CARES
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$8k · revenue +49%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FOODGRAINS
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$6k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k
  • R
    RAFT
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k
  • UC
    UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA - UKRAINE SUPPORT
    one grant, 2022 · C$1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Reach Out Niagara Family Support Services

Mental Health Services Counseling and Support Programs

—
2
West Niagara Second Stage Housing & Counselling Inc

Housing & counselling programs, Transitional housing and support programs. Counselling and support for children during transition.

—
3
Community Care of West Niagara

Food bank emergency financial assistance christmas food and back to school drives

—
4
Community Support Services of Niagara Region

Meals on wheels congregate dining volunteer transportation visiting and social safety service arrangements and coordination homemaking fall prevention and wellness supportive housing

—
5
Children's Aid Society of the Niagara Region

Family and children's services niagara provides mandated child welfare services to the niagara region include:the investigation of the possible abuse or neglect of children; children protection services; foster care; adoption services;…

—
6
Niagara Victim Crisis Support Service Inc

Immediate short term crisis intervention for victims of crime or tragic circumstances within niagara region. emotional support counselling programs and services for victims.

—
7
Gateway Residential and Community Support Services of Niagara Inc.

Housing and case management support for individuals dealing with mental health and homelessness Housing supports provided via group home market units subsidized housing and several agency owned affordable housing projects

—
8
FOOD4KIDS Niagara

Food4kids niagara offers a program called 'weekends without hunger' to school aged children in the niagara region to provide underprivilaged children with food and resources to protect their well-being during and outside of school hours…

—
9
Foundation of Resources for Teens of West Niagara

The following services to youth: well balanced meals offered daily; community service hours; guidance in making healthy choices; access to computers; job finding support; positive peer interaction; community referrals; crisis intervention;…

—
10
North York Women's Shelter

Provide food shelter and counseling to women and their children who are fleeing violence.

—
11
West Niagara Affordable Housing
—
12
United Way of South Niagara
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Niagara Resource Service for Youth and the most unlike its peers is Angola Memorial Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAVE SPRINGS CAMP — C$16,061 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPELHAM CARES — C$8,480 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCANADIAN FOODGRAINS — C$5,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING NIAGARA — C$4,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RAFT — C$3,480 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANGOLA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND — C$3,250 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBIRCHWAY NIAGARA — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Red Cross (BC Flood Relief) — C$3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROSE CITY KIDS — C$2,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNIAGARA NUTRITION PARTNGRS — C$2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSyrian Refugee Fund — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSt. Paul's College — C$1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHospice Niagara — C$1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CENTRE — C$1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFACS NIAGARA FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBrock Chaplaincy — C$500 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAVE SPRINGS CAMP ↗
  • Who funds PELHAM CARES ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN FOODGRAINS ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING NIAGARA ↗
  • Who funds THE RAFT ↗
  • Who funds ANGOLA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds BIRCHWAY NIAGARA ↗
  • Who funds Canadian Red Cross (BC Flood Relief) ↗
  • Who funds ROSE CITY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds NIAGARA NUTRITION PARTNGRS ↗
  • Who funds Syrian Refugee Fund ↗
  • Who funds St. Paul's College ↗
  • Who funds Hospice Niagara ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds FACS NIAGARA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Brock Chaplaincy ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way NiagaraON11.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Niagara · Niagara Community Foundation Fondation Communautaire de Niagara · Fonthill United Church · Morgans Point United Church · Erwin Taylor Charitable Foundation · Ctfs Employees' Charity Trust · Wise Guys Charity Fund · The Ontario Paper Thorold Foundation · Wesley United Church · Pelham Community Church · Central United Church · St Davids Queenston United Church

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 130177819:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fenwick United Church’s filings →