Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization
Faith Bible Church of Winnipeg Inc.
Worship service pastoral care adult and child religious instruction weddings funerals mission work and project support.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$24k
- C$10k–50k4 grants · C$83k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NCEM | C$26,400 |
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION | C$19,200 |
| CITY CHURCH | C$19,000 |
| YOUTH FOR CHRIST | C$18,000 |
| RIO GRANDE BIBLE INSTITUTE | C$9,600 |
| LIVING BIBLE EXPLORERS | C$7,200 |
| FRIENDS OF ISRAEL | C$6,000 |
| ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE | C$1,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- NNCEM7× · 2017–2024 · C$278k · revenue +49%
- UGUNION GOSPEL MISSION8× · 2017–2024 · C$156k · revenue +61%
- CCCITY CHURCH8× · 2017–2024 · C$77k · revenue +183%
Funded once
- NCNORTHERN CANADA EVANGELICAL MISSIONone grant, 2018 · C$18k
- RGRIO GRANDE BIBLE INSTITUTEone grant, 2021 · C$9k
- RGRIO GRANDE BIBLE INSTITUTEone grant, 2019 · C$8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Missionary training -bible studies
Counselling bible camps family teachings
Reign ministries canada inc engages in the training of students in discipleship and evangelism for the purpose of sharing jesus christ internationally each summer
Local Church curriculum; summer and winter camps for children and teens with biblical training emphasis; one year post secondary Bible Institute with in depth Bible instruction and Christian ministry and service training.
Evangelism Teaching Preaching Church Ministry Home Ministry Conferences Workshops Community Outreach Young Adult Ministries
Conferences teaching bible study & counseling
We conduct weekly bible clubs and bible studies run two summer camps for recreational and religious programs conduct vacation bible schools mail bible studies upon request. provide training for church and sunday school teachers conduct…
Bible teaching guest speaker spiritual counselling
Provide christian literature and bible lessons to interested people
Publication of brochures and manuscripts containing religious information; bible study; camp; support of mission and evangelization work
Counselling with a biblical perspective- pastoral counselling - youth work businesses marriage individuals
Leadership Formation Programs Prayer Meetings Decipleship Training Programs Adults Youth and Teens Spiritual Formations Prayer Gatherings Music Ministry Training Social Outreach and Training Sessions Program for International Students in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living Bible Explorers Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Teen Challenge of Central Canada Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.