Saskatoon, SK · Charitable organization
Faith Alive Ministries World Outreach Centre Inc.
The presentation of the gospel of jesus christ and christian religion through evangelical preaching and missionary work.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$12k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$41k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FE VIVA WORLD MISSIONS | C$31,169 |
| GOSPEL FIRE FOR ALL NATIONS | C$10,000 |
| HOUSE OF REFUGE STREET MINISTRIES | C$6,650 |
| CITY CENTRE COMMUNITY RENEWAL INITIATIVES INC. | C$4,700 |
| JEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FVFE VIVA WORLD MISSIONS8× · 2017–2024 · C$177k · revenue +79%
- HOHouse of Refuge Street Ministries8× · 2017–2024 · C$62k · revenue +22%
- CCCity Centre Community Renewal Initiatives Inc.8× · 2017–2024 · C$41k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- BMBridge Ministries Internationalgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +85%
- BCBRAMALEA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPone grant, 2021 · C$1k
- MLMeadow Lake Bridge Ministriesone grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue -17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Evangelical ministry
Preaching teaching pastoral care home outreach facilitate worship services
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Spreading sharing teaching preaching the gospel of our lord jesus christ
Christian broadcasting live streaming internet television proclaiming the gospel message of the Lord Jesus Christ using television and internet media. Regular worship services and teaching the Word of God.
Spread the gospel of jesus christ
Spread the gospel of Jesus Christ, bible studies and worship.
Weekly church services Bible studies and travelling evangelism
Revive nations is a ministry with a passion to raise jesus lovers across the world and on a mission to win souls for jesus touching nations one life at a time.
To encourage and equip people who already have a relationship with jesus christ and also bring those who do not know jesus christ to an understanding of who he is.
Christian ministry
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saskatoon Full Gospel Church Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Jewish Voice Ministries Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FE VIVA WORLD MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds House of Refuge Street Ministries ↗
- Who funds City Centre Community Renewal Initiatives Inc. ↗
- Who funds GOSPEL FIRE FOR ALL NATIONS ↗
- Who funds Jewish Voice Ministries ↗
- Who funds KEYSTONE VICTORIA CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds RICK 4 CAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Bridge Ministries International ↗
- Who funds Meadow Lake Bridge Ministries ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ministers Network Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.