Eyebrow, SK · Public foundation
Eyebrow Saskatchewan Health-Care Association Auxilliary
We hold fund raisers-luncheons-suppers with silent auction items and a christmas cookie walk.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTRAL BUTTE REGENCY MANOR HOSPITAL AUX | C$1,000 |
| IVER MAIN PLACE | C$1,000 |
| STARS TRAUMA AIR RESCUE SERVICE | C$800 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$800 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- IMIVER MAIN PLACE2× · 2018–2019 · C$3k
- CBCENTRAL BUTTE REGENCY MANOR AUX2× · 2018–2019 · C$3k
- IMIVER MAIN PLACE3× · 2020–2024 · C$2k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- RMREGENCY MANOR AUXILIARYone grant, 2020 · C$650 · revenue +17%
- FHFIVE HILLS REGENCY MANORone grant, 2019 · C$650
- CBCentral Butte Regency Manor Auxiliaryone grant, 2017 · C$600
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.