Debert, NS · Charitable organization
Evangeline Pentecostal Camp
Provides Christian based camping programs for all age groups
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Evangel Pentecostal Church | C$3,170 |
| Evangel Assembly | C$2,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- POPAOC-National Office3× · 2017–2019 · C$6k · revenue +22%
- TCTeen Challange3× · 2017–2022 · C$4k · revenue +40%
- SHSouls Harbor2× · 2018–2019 · C$3k · revenue +662%
Funded once
- MDMARINE DR PENTECOSTAL CHURCHone grant, 2019 · C$8k · revenue -4%
- HHHarvest House Atlantic Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$7k · revenue +65%
- KWKings Way Assemblyone grant, 2023 · C$5k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Weekly church services (online and in person) weekly children's ministry weekly youth ministry bible study and support groups church discipleship missionary support seniors' ministry community involvement widow's care spiritual care for…
Mission services - outreach meals and feeding programs Church services - congregation meetings place of worship bible study shower facility youth outreach
Church services youth programs children's programs community events women's/men's ministries
Sunday Church Services Sunday School Weekly Bible Studies Children's Ministries Women's Ministries Senior Ministries Outreach Program
Conduct sunday church services bible studies youth events and community outreach.
We hold weekly worship services -we provide ministries for women men youth and children weekly/monthly -we conduct small group bible studies -we conduct programs helping recovering addicts
Sunday worship weekly prayer meetings weekly fellowship for children youth and adults bible studies for men & women support worldwide missions pastoral care & young adults montly ministry
Maintain and operate a local church including sunday worship services sunday school program and prayer time. provide various programs for children youthm and adults. support the worldwide missionary program of the pentecostal assemblies.
Prayer meetings Bible studies Sunday morning worship
Worship services prayer and bible study
Sunday worship services sunday school youth group junior youth group weekly bible studies ladies outreach vacation bible school
Sunday and mid-week services seminars youth and adult sunday school weekend outreach
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evangel Pentecostal Church and the most unlike its peers is Jocelyn Stewart Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARINE DR PENTECOSTAL CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Harvest House Atlantic Inc ↗
- Who funds PAOC-National Office ↗
- Who funds Evangel Pentecostal Church ↗
- Who funds Kings Way Assembly ↗
- Who funds Jocelyn Stewart Foundation ↗
- Who funds Teen Challange ↗
- Who funds Souls Harbor ↗
- Who funds Servants Heart ↗
- Who funds Evangel Assembly ↗
- Who funds Lighthouse of Cape Breton ↗
- Who funds Light to The Nations ↗
- Who funds Full Gospel Church ↗
- Who funds Gideons ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.