Preeceville, SK · Charitable organization
Evangel Church
Sunday worship services weekday bible study weekday prayer meetings supporting missions young peoples' group
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAOC SASK DISTRICT OFFICE | C$7,058 |
| PAOC MISSION | C$500 |
| KETCHAN LAKE BIBLE CAMP | C$500 |
| POWER TO CHANGE | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PSPAOC SASK DISTRICT OFFICE2× · 2023–2024 · C$12k
- PAPENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA2× · 2017–2020 · C$7k · revenue -23%
- PMPAOC Missions2× · 2022–2023 · C$2k
Funded once
- PDPAOC District Officeone grant, 2022 · C$3k
- TPTHE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA SK DISTRICTone grant, 2021 · C$2k
- TPTHE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA INTERNATIONAL OFFICEone grant, 2021 · C$670
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.