Skip to content
Canadian charities

Outremont, QC · Public foundation

Euro Charities Foundation Fondation caritative Euro

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply from time to time all or part thereof and the income derived therefrom to qualified donees in accordance with the Income Tax Act (Canada).

C$247k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$47k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$200k
C$100,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
B'Nai Levy FoundationC$100,000
B'Nai Levy FoundationC$100,000
Ohr Chaya Charitable OrganizationC$47,051
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$874k · 5 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

C$874k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-21%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    B'nai Levy Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$620k · revenue -49%
  • RC
    RAYJO CHARITABLE TRUST
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$162k · revenue -53%
  • OC
    Ohr Chaya Charitable Organization
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$90k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • MV
    MENUCHA VESIMCHAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue +97%
  • V
    VMM
    one grant, 2021 · C$250
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BELZ
    one grant, 2021 · C$250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
2
Tzidkas Yisorel

The organization intends to operate as a charitable foundation whose purpose is primarily to make donations to qualified donees.

—
3
Kolel Yeshivat Kehilat Jacob

To support with and participate with the scholarships provided by yeshivat kehilat yackov in brooklyn new york

—
4
Congrégation Kehal Toldos Yakov Yosef

1.- to foster and encourage the practice and study of the jewish religion and development of behaviour among the jewish community with the goal of advancing the jewish religion. 2. -to organize causes classes lectures and seminars with the…

—
5
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
6
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
7
The Yad Ezer Fund
—
8
Zolty Charitable Foundation

Administered the charitable activities of the zolty family and others for the advancement of education and jewish religion and loans to the needy.

—
9
Chesed L'Yakov Free Loan / Prêt sans intérêts La bonté de Yakov

To provide interest free loans to needy people.

—
10
Fondation Rabbin Yakov Yitzchok Neumann / Rabbi Yakov Yitzchok Neumann Foundation

Provide income to other charities and qualified donees

—
11
The Dov Zimmerman Z'l Foundation

To make donations to charitable organizations

—
12
Gemach Zichron Burech Zvi

Provide interest free benevolent loans to needy and to qualified donees

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hatzolas Yisroel D'arizal and the most unlike its peers is Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetB'nai Levy Foundation — C$620,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetRAYJO CHARITABLE TRUST — C$161,645 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetOhr Chaya Charitable Organization — C$90,176 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$1,234 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Israel of Montreal — C$975 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChasdei Tovim Meoros — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL TYY — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Jewish Community Foun…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC8.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 799146337:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Euro Charities Foundation Fondation caritative Euro’s filings →