Skip to content
Canadian charities

Newmarket, ON · Private foundation

Eternal Investment Foundation

Donate monies to charities I) which are registered charities under the income tax act of canada or ii) qualified donees as such is defined from time to time in the income tax act of canada

C$300k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$105k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$15k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$50k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$235k
C$20,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHAREWORLD GLOBAL CANADAC$105,000
INNOVA CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN ACADEMYC$75,000
NIAGARA CLASSICAL ACADEMYC$55,000
KAWARTHA CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN SCHOOLC$20,000
ETHNOS CANADAC$20,000
SOVEREIGN GRACE CHURCH BRADFORDC$10,000
SIM CANADAC$5,000
EZRA INSTITUTE FOR CONTEMPORARY CHRISTIANITYC$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSEC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.5M · 7 repeat orgsC$87k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

C$1.5M
C$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-19%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    Innova Classical Christian Academy
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$1.2M · revenue +212% · 28% of their budget
  • SG
    SHAREWORLD GLOBAL CANADA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$145k · revenue +39%
  • EC
    ETHNOS CANADA
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$50k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • EM
    ETHNOS MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue -19%
  • WC
    Westminister Classical Christian Acadeny
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k
  • WI
    Walk in the Word Canada
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -99%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Speak Life Global

To encourage teach and disciple the christian church around the world.

—
2
Biblica Canada

Transforming lives through god's word through bible translation bible publishing and bible engagement programs throughout canada and the world.

—
3
Global Scholars Canada

The mission of global scholars canada is to identify develop send equip and support missional christian academics for work primarily in open enrollment post secondary institutions around the world with the objective to inspire and…

—
4
Great Commission Collective Canada

Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches

—
5
International Christian Ministries

International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…

—
6
Training Leaders International Canada

To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.

—
7
International Bible College
—
8
Seed International Mission of Canada (Seed Canada)

Missionary training -bible studies

—
9
Bic Canada - Global

Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…

—
10
Equip Leadership Canada

A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide

—
11
The Evangelical Christian Church in Canada
—
12
Ravi Zacharias International Ministries Canada

A bible based ministry focused on worldwide evangelism undegirded by apologetics. aims to reach the opinion shapers of the culture and thereby influence the culture with the philisophical claims of the historic christian faith. speak in…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sim Canada and the most unlike its peers is Niagara Classical Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInnova Classical Christian Academy — C$1,205,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetSHAREWORLD GLOBAL CANADA — C$145,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetNIAGARA CLASSICAL ACADEMY — C$55,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetETHNOS CANADA — C$50,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEZRA INSTITUTE FOR CONTEMPORARY CHRISTIANITY — C$50,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetTHE SAMARITAN'S PURSE - CANADA — C$45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKAWARTHA CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — C$25,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetURBANPROMISE TORONTO — C$21,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetETHNOS MINISTRIES — C$10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSOVEREIGN GRACE CHURCH BRADFORD — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSIM CANADA — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWalk in the Word Canada — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Canadahelps Canadon
Canadahelps CanadonON2.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 845373547:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Eternal Investment’s filings →