Cobourg, ON · Charitable organization
Eternal Hope Spiritualist Centre
Worship services psychic tea development classes - closed during covid 19 however still supported the community through donations opened doors in december 2021 for the first time after covid 19.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FARE SHARE FOOD BANK | C$500 |
| PFLG | C$350 |
| TRANSITION HOUSE COALITION OF NORTHUMBERLAND | C$350 |
| CORNERSTONE | C$350 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +171% since the first grant, against +96% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$350 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FSFARE SHARE FOOD BANK4× · 2017–2021 · C$2k · revenue ×12
- THTRANSITION HOUSE COALITION OF NORTHUMBERLAND3× · 2019–2021 · C$1k · revenue +171%
- GWGREEN WOOD COALITION3× · 2017–2019 · C$850 · revenue +71%
Funded once
- EHED'S HOUSE NORTHUMBERLANDone grant, 2020 · C$800 · revenue +22%
- NHNORTHUMBERLAND HILLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$500 · revenue +96%
- THTransition Houseone grant, 2017 · C$100
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide housing for seniors and low income individuals.
North house provides a wide range of housing and support programs for those who are at risk or in crisis within the communitied or north durham. the programs are aimed at helping low income families and individuals in need of subsidized…
Our auxiliary is active year round with approx 35 members all volunteers accruing aprox 6000 volunteer hours. we support nchcc (nsh) requests for in-patient out-patient palliative and primary health care unmet needs.
Raise funds for the Northumberland Hills Hospital for capital equipment - Provide volunteers to support the Northumberland Hills Hospital in its day-to-day operations
The purpose of the volunteer association to norfolk general hospital and norfolk hospital nursing home is to assist norfolk general hospital and norfolk hospital nursing home in their objectives of giving the best patient and resident care…
Home for seniors 24 hour nursing care and personal care to the residents.
For fundraising to operate and expand the hospice services with ed’s house
Provide food shelter and counseling to women and their children who are fleeing violence.
Operating a food bank in colchester county nova scotia
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Care Northumberland and the most unlike its peers is Pflag Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FARE SHARE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds TRANSITION HOUSE COALITION OF NORTHUMBERLAND ↗
- Who funds GREEN WOOD COALITION ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE ↗
- Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
- Who funds ED'S HOUSE NORTHUMBERLAND ↗
- Who funds NORTHUMBERLAND HILLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PFLG ↗
- Who funds BOWMANVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The KNOR Foundation: Local Food for Local Good · Northumberland United Way · Hickey Family Foundation · Calvary Baptist Church Cobourg · Port Hope United Church · Saskatoon Community Foundation · St Andrew's Presbyterian Church · Christ the Servant Catholic Church · Grace Christian Reformed Church of Cobourg · The Read Elliott Family Foundation · Link Charity Canada Inc · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.