Wainwright, AB · Private foundation
Encompass Community Charitable Foundation
Support of community organizations in the wainwright and surrounding areas.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$8k
- C$10k–50k8 grants · C$127k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TOWN OF WAINWRIGHT | C$45,200 |
| VILLAGE OF EDGERTON | C$14,090 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$13,900 |
| FRIENDS OF WAINWRIGHT HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION | C$12,500 |
| WAINWRIGHT BATTLE RIVER FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION | C$11,500 |
| VILLAGE OF IRMA | C$10,000 |
| IRMA FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION | C$10,000 |
| WAINWRIGHT FIRE & RESCUE SOCIETY | C$10,000 |
| WAINWRIGHT PRAIRIE SENIOR ASSOCIATION | C$7,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +180% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$72k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TOTOWN OF WAINWRIGHT3× · 2022–2024 · C$174k
- WFWAINWRIGHT FIRE & RESCUE SOCIETY3× · 2022–2024 · C$70k · revenue +180% · 53% of their budget
- WPWAINWRIGHT PRAIRIE SENIOR ASSOCIATION2× · 2023–2024 · C$13k · revenue -9%
Funded once
- WDWAINWRIGHT & DISTRICT HANDIVAN SOCIETYone grant, 2022 · C$22k · revenue -64%
- WDWAINWRIGHT& DISTRICT COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · C$15k · revenue -7%
- EEEDGERTON EMERGENCY SERVICES SOCIETYone grant, 2023 · C$13k · revenue -28% · 30% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Maintenance of cemetery grounds
Due to lack of membership and break-ins we are currently in the process of dissolving the organizations. all equipment and buildings are being given away at no cost to other museums.
Preservation of archies and artifacts for wainwright and area.
Farmers' market light horse and pony show tractor show
Fire protection and medical aid
Provide small comfort items to aux hosp residents kleenex lotion xmas gifts donit + coffee for residents
Provides facilities and hosts for local rodeos and community.
Operate a seniors lodge for the residents of wainwright and area
To promote the efficiency and effectiveness of alberta health services' charitable programs by providing and maintaining facilities for this purpose.
Break open ticket sales
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wainwright Fire and Rescue Society and the most unlike its peers is Edgerton Emergency Services Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WAINWRIGHT FIRE & RESCUE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WAINWRIGHT & DISTRICT HANDIVAN SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WAINWRIGHT& DISTRICT COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDGERTON EMERGENCY SERVICES SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WAINWRIGHT PRAIRIE SENIOR ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ROSENDALE CEMETERY COMPANY ↗
- Who funds WAINWRIGHT CITIZENS ON PATROL ↗
- Who funds MADD (MADDEN AND DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY) ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.