Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Eglise Unitarienne de Montréal / Unitarian Church of Montreal

Instruction institution carried on church activities: sunday service religious education support to community and refugee families other religious services

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$326
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUBERGE TRANSITIONC$1,000
DOCTORS WITH BORDERSC$326
L'ABRI EN VILLEC$209
WOMEN ON THE RISEC$168
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$45k · 16 repeat orgsC$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +111% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
19

Total granted

C$45k
C$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+37%

Still filing today

75%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$326 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    AUBERGE MADELEINE
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$11k · revenue +109%
  • AT
    AUBERGE TRANSITION
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$11k · revenue +89%
  • CD
    CHEZ DORIS
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$4k · revenue +482%

Funded once

  • NW
    NATIVE WOMEN'S SHELTER OF MONTREALgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue +219%
  • FC
    FLAMING CHALICE ITNLgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue +585%
  • NW
    NATIVE WOMEN'S SHELTER OF MONTREAL
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Maison Séjour

Maison d'hébergement pour femmes violentés ou en difficulté temporaire avec ou sans enfant

—
2
Maison Pour Femmes Immigrantes

Offrir un lieu d'hébergement temporaire et de transition aux femmes immigrantes et à leurs enfants victimes de violence conjugale

—
3
Maison d'Hébergement Simonne-Monet-Chartrand

Maison d'hébergement pour femmes violentées centre d'intervention socio-judiciaire sensibilisation prévention

—
4
Maison d'hébergement d'Anjou

Accueil et hébergement pour femmes en difficultés avec ou sans enfants. programme d'intervention visant l'autonomie féminine . programme de sensibilisation à l'externe.

—
5
Residence Le Portail

Hébergement-thérapie en cure pour les femmes ayant des dépendances alcooliques toxicomanes affectives etc

—
6
Transition Pour Elles Inc.

Héberger temporairement des femmes en difficultés et ayant des problèmes de santé mentale. informer et orienter ces femmes. leur offrir un cadre accueillant et sécuritaire. offrir des service d'animation d'accompagnement et de suivi.

—
7
Le Mieux-Etre Des Immigrants

Aide à l'intégration de immigrants dépannage alimentaire cours de francisation écoute et aide aux problèmes

—
8
Maison Anita Lebel

Offrir aux femmes victimes de violence conjugale ave ou sans enfants un logement sécuritaire et abordable. offrir un suivi psychosocial individuel et de groupe aux femmes. orienter les femmes vers des services d'aide et de support.

—
9
Maison Marie-Marguerite

Accuiellir accompagner et venir en aide aux femmes violentées avec ou sans enfants vivant des problématiques multiples. services offerts depuis 2022 : services d'intervention individuelle ateliers présence dans les milieux communautaires…

—
10
Le Rempart - Centre d'hébergement et d'accueil

Héberger des femmes en situation d’itinérance ou à risque de répondre à leurs besoins immédiats et de fournir des services d’accompagnement et de soutien favorisant leur réinsertion sociale.

—
11
Maison Internationale des Femmes

Sollicitations ciblées par téléphone. application aux appels de projets assistances aux ainées immigrantes dans le besoin interventions auprès des femmes en difficulté relationnel de les couples et au niveau des emplois

—
12
Centre-Femmes 'La Jardilec' Inc

Venir en aide aux femmes souffrant d'isolement psycho social

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fondation du refuge pour femmes Chez Doris Inc. Chez Doris Women's Shelter Foundation Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Canadahelps Canadon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
19/21
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAUBERGE MADELEINE — C$11,425 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAUBERGE TRANSITION — C$10,575 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCHEZ DORIS — C$4,390 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetELIZABETH HOUSE — C$3,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetNATIVE WOMEN'S SHELTER OF MONTREAL — C$2,790 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFLAMING CHALICE ITNL — C$2,300 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetNDG FOOD DEPOT — C$1,448 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetABRI EN VILLE — C$1,424 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEADS AND HANDS — C$1,246 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSANTROPOL ROULANT — C$1,021 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGENDER CREATIVE KIDS — C$1,004 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCAMP COSMOS — C$642 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetL'ITINERAIRE — C$637 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION ST MICHAEL — C$616 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMONTREAL DIET DISPENSARY — C$444 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE FRIENDSHIP CENTRE OF MONTREAL — C$404 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION COMMUNAUTAIRE MILE END — C$397 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSYRIAN KIDS FOUNDATION — C$393 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIENVENUE A NDG — C$365 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIRA — C$142 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLAMING CHALICE — C$75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUBERGE MADELEINE ↗
  • Who funds AUBERGE TRANSITION ↗
  • Who funds CHEZ DORIS ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE WOMEN'S SHELTER OF MONTREAL ↗
  • Who funds FLAMING CHALICE ITNL ↗
  • Who funds NDG FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds ABRI EN VILLE ↗
  • Who funds HEADS AND HANDS ↗
  • Who funds SANTROPOL ROULANT ↗
  • Who funds GENDER CREATIVE KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CAMP COSMOS ↗
  • Who funds L'ITINERAIRE ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ST MICHAEL ↗
  • Who funds MONTREAL DIET DISPENSARY ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE FRIENDSHIP CENTRE OF MONTREAL ↗
  • Who funds MISSION COMMUNAUTAIRE MILE END ↗
  • Who funds SYRIAN KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIENVENUE A NDG ↗
  • Who funds MIRA ↗
  • Who funds FLAMING CHALICE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

La Fondation du Grand…Fondation de la famil…Church of St Andrew a…The George Hogg Famil…Jewish Community Foun…Centraide Du Grand Mo…The Hay Foundation/La…Hylcan Foundation / L…The Macdonald Stewart…The J W McConnell Fam…R. Howard Webster Fou…Raymond James Canada …
La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater MontrealQC15× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Fondation de la famille Zeller · Church of St Andrew and St Paul · The George Hogg Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · The Hay Foundation/La Fondation Hay · Hylcan Foundation / La Fondation Hylcan · The Macdonald Stewart Foundation - la Fondation Macdonald Stewart · The J W McConnell Family Foundation/La Fondation de la Famille J W McConnell · R. Howard Webster Foundation / Fondation R. Howard Webster · Raymond James Canada Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 887950046:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Eglise Unitarienne de Montréal / Unitarian Church of Montreal’s filings →