Deux-Montagnes, QC · Charitable organization
Église Peoples de Deux Montagnes
Worship services bible studies children's programs fellowship meals movie nights
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION CAN. | C$7,000 |
| JET (JUS QU'AUX EXREMITIES DE LA TERRE) | C$1,000 |
| ONE HOPE MINISTRIES OF CANADA | C$1,000 |
| POWER TO CHANGE | C$800 |
| LE GROUPE JASPE | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$500 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CTCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION CAN.2× · 2023–2024 · C$8k · revenue +12%
- OHONE HOPE MINISTRIES OF CANADA6× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +107%
- PTPOWER TO CHANGE5× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- WOWord of Life Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$600 · revenue -59%
- MYMontreal Youth Unlimited (Montreal Youth for Christ)one grant, 2017 · C$600
- WVWorld Visionone grant, 2017 · C$480 · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To bring Christianity to places that have not been reached as of yet and to train young people to do the same.
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Répandre l'évangile au pays et outre-mer (europe afrique) enseignement biblique par différents cours emissions de radio diffusion conférences
Missionary training -bible studies
Missions/evangelism
Post-secondary Bible Institute with in depth Bible instruction and Christian ministry service training; Language School teaching French as a Second Language primarily to missionaries to French-speaking countries; Summer and Winter Bible…
Our vision is to reach the French World for Christ. We promote fund and distribute French Christian literature in Canada and other French speaking countries. We help organize evangelism campaigns. We host short-term missions teams in…
Conducts missionary work in the developing countries
École de formation biblique (missionnaire) maison d'accueil pour temps de repos et restauration camps pour jeunes et adultes dont l'objectif est de développer des compétences pour le travail d'équipe et le leadership voyages missionnaires…
Promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ maily through media
Broadcasting bible teaching programs on the following stations: kari am 550 at 10am & 8pm for british columbia cjca am 930 at 5:30pm weekdays for edmonton alberta cjli am 700 at 10:30am and 8:00pm for calgary alberta ckjs am 810 at 9:15am…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Power to Change Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Le Groupe Jaspe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION CAN. ↗
- Who funds ONE HOPE MINISTRIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds POWER TO CHANGE ↗
- Who funds JET (JUS QU 'AUX EXTREMITIES DE LA TERRE) ↗
- Who funds SERVANT'S HEART MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Word of Life Canada ↗
- Who funds LE GROUPE JASPE ↗
- Who funds World Vision ↗
- Who funds RBC Ministries (Canada) ↗
- Who funds Options Pregnancy Centre,(Montreal Youth for Christ) ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.