Gatineau, QC · Charitable organization
Eglise Nouvelle Alliance
Vivre la foi chrétienne etre en mesure de la partager et de faire connaitre l'espoir en jésus de facon réelle et concrete.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$20k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$28k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| APDC DISTRICT DU QUÉBEC | C$28,409 |
| APDC MISSIONS BUREAU NATIONAL | C$8,865 |
| CENTRE ESPOIR DE GATINEAU | C$7,556 |
| INSTITUT BIBLIQUE DU QUÉBEC | C$3,750 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- AAPDC5× · 2017–2024 · C$163k · revenue +32%
- AAPDC6× · 2017–2024 · C$117k · revenue +22%
- IBInstitut Biblique du Québec7× · 2017–2024 · C$27k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- CECENTRE ESPOIR DE GATINEAUone grant, 2022 · C$5k
- CECENTRE ESPOIR DE GATINEAUone grant, 2019 · C$4k
- CECENTRE ESPOIR DE GATINEAUone grant, 2021 · C$3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Organismes missionnaires et propagation de l'évangile
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Tenir et administrer une église évangélique
Évangélisation de la communauté
Prêcher l'évangile de jésus-christ dans les églises diriger des campagnes d'évangélisation imprimer éditer enregistrer diffuser et distribuer de la documentation en conformité avec les objectifs de l'organisme.
S'occuper du fonctionnement d'une église évangélique annoncer l'évangile de jésus-christ parmi les nations donner des cours de formation religieuse.
Enseignement des préceptes bibliques et prédicaiton de l'évangile de jésus-christ.
Culte évangélique biblique
Administrer et maintenir une église évangélique et proclamer l'évangile de jésus-christ
L'organisme est sous la loi des corporation religieuses du québec
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is District Du QuÉBec Des AssemblÉEs De La PentecÔTe Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Erdo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.