Saint-Hyacinthe, QC · Charitable organization
Église Nouveau Debut de la Cote Nord
Administrer une église évangélique chrétienne.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ÉGLISE NOUVELLE VIE DE LONGUEUIL | C$62,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against -34% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$62k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- IDINSTITUT DE THÉOLOGIE POUR LA FRANCOPHONIE4× · 2017–2020 · C$8k · revenue +7%
- ACASSOCIATION CHRÉTIENNE POUR LA FRANCOPHONIE4× · 2017–2020 · C$7k · revenue -37%
- LMLA MAISON DES FEMMES SEPT-ILES2× · 2017–2020 · C$350 · revenue +85%
Funded once
- MLMINISTÈRE LOUANGE ADORATION LIFEone grant, 2018 · C$850 · revenue -34%
- ÉAÉGLISE ALTITUDEone grant, 2017 · C$350 · revenue -77%
- HSHOMMES SEPT-ÎLES CENTRE D'ENTRAIDE POUR HOMMES INC.graduatedone grant, 2019 · C$150 · revenue +194%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ÉGLISE NOUVELLE VIE DE LONGUEUIL ↗
- Who funds INSTITUT DE THÉOLOGIE POUR LA FRANCOPHONIE (ITF) ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION CHRÉTIENNE POUR LA FRANCOPHONIE ↗
- Who funds MINISTÈRE LOUANGE ADORATION LIFE ↗
- Who funds LA MAISON DES FEMMES SEPT-ILES ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE ALTITUDE ↗
- Who funds HOMMES SEPT-ÎLES CENTRE D'ENTRAIDE POUR HOMMES INC. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Église Nouvelle Vie de Longueuil · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.