Ottawa, ON · Charitable organization
Église le Centre
Precher la Bonne Nouvelle et avoir des rencontres en Eglise le dimanche et pendant la semaine pour les hommes femmes et enfants.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k6 grants · C$27k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Alliance Internationale des Ministeres Evangéliques | C$34,730 |
| Canadian Assembly of God | C$8,690 |
| Peer Servants Canada | C$7,800 |
| Bridges of Hope | C$4,000 |
| Ministeres Enseignemoi | C$3,500 |
| Pain de Vie Évangelisation | C$2,000 |
| ShareWord Global | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PSPEER SERVANTS CANADA7× · 2017–2024 · C$49k · revenue +33% · 60% of their budget
- CACanadian Assembly of God3× · 2018–2024 · C$19k · revenue +27%
- LIL'ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE DES GÉDÉONS7× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- BPBILL PRANKARD EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue -9%
- URUN REFUGE SOUS SES AILESone grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue -1%
- WFWATER FIRST EDUCATION AND TRAININGone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Répandre l'évangile au pays et outre-mer (europe afrique) enseignement biblique par différents cours emissions de radio diffusion conférences
Prêcher l'évangile de jésus-christ. organiser les activités chrétiennes. effectuer un travail missionnaire
Publication d'articles des revues le précurseur et mic mission news sur le site web presse missionnaire mic (pressuremic.org).
Faire connaitre la parole de dieu
Participation dans les conférences et séminaires évangéliques. enseignement et prédication de la bible. production de matériel d'enseignement évangélique.
Promouvoir l'evangelisation du christ par les moyens de la predication et diverses autres
Precher la parole de dieu
Évangélisation de la communauté
To encourage teach and disciple the christian church around the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ministères EnseigneMoi / TeachMe Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Miriam Centre for Mothers in Need of Ottawa-Carleton Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASSEMBLÉES DE DIEU CANADIENNE FRANCAISE ↗
- Who funds TENDER LOVING CARE CHILDREN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PEER SERVANTS CANADA ↗
- Who funds Canadian Assembly of God ↗
- Who funds L'ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE DES GÉDÉONS ↗
- Who funds Pain de Vie Évangelisation ↗
- Who funds Bridges of Hope ↗
- Who funds Ministeres Enseignemoi ↗
- Who funds BILL PRANKARD EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UN REFUGE SOUS SES AILES ↗
- Who funds WATER FIRST EDUCATION AND TRAINING ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN FARMERS CANADA ↗
- Who funds Productions Art Gospel ↗
- Who funds The Evangelical Fellowship Of Canada ↗
- Who funds LE GROUPE JASPE ↗
- Who funds CENTRE MIRIAM ↗
- Who funds Jericho Road Christian Ministries ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: L'Assemblée de la bonne nouvelle à montréal · Link Charity Canada Inc · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.