Sherbrooke, QC · Charitable organization
Eglise Evangelique Baptiste L'Eau Vive
L'église évangélique baptiste l'eau vive
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAROLE DE VIE BÉTHEL | C$4,800 |
| THE FELLOWSHIP OF EVANGELICAL BAPTIST CHURCHES IN CANADA | C$2,400 |
| L'HEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLE | C$2,200 |
| ÉGLISE DE L'ILE JÉSUS CHRÉTIENNE ÉVANGÉLIQUE BAPTISTE | C$1,200 |
| CAMP PATMOS | C$1,200 |
| AFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATION (CANADA) | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PDPAROLE DE VIE BÉTHEL8× · 2017–2024 · C$29k · revenue +8%
- TFTHE FELLOWSHIP OF EVANGELICAL BAPTIST CHURCHES IN CANADA5× · 2020–2024 · C$12k · revenue +27%
- LDL'HEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLE5× · 2020–2024 · C$8k · revenue +22%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PAROLE DE VIE BÉTHEL ↗
- Who funds THE FELLOWSHIP OF EVANGELICAL BAPTIST CHURCHES IN CANADA ↗
- Who funds L'ÉGLISE DE L'ILE JÉSUS CHRÉTIENNE ÉVANGÉLIQUE BAPTISTE ↗
- Who funds L'HEURE DE LA BONNE NOUVELLE ↗
- Who funds CAMP PATMOS ↗
- Who funds AFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL (CANADA) ↗
- Who funds Organisme Renaissance Autochtones ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.