Chibougamau, QC · Charitable organization
Eglise Evangelique Baptiste de Chibougamau
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE FELLOWSHIPS OF EVANGELICAL BAPTISTE CHURCHES IN CANADA | C$2,500 |
| ASSOCIATION D'EGLISE EVANGELIQUE AU QUEBEC | C$500 |
| NOEL POUR TOUT LE MONDE | C$300 |
| CAMP PATMOS DES EGLISE EVANGELIQUE BAPTISTE QUEBEC | C$300 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHE FELLOWSHIPS OF EVANGELICAL BAPTISTE CHURCH IN CANADA7× · 2017–2023 · C$15k · revenue +58%
- ADASSOCIATION D'EGLISE EVANGELIQUE AU QUEBEC8× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +76%
- LIL'ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE DES GÉEDÉONS AU CANAA3× · 2017–2019 · C$3k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- ÉÉÉGLISE ÉVANGÉLIQUE BAPTISTE DES ETCHEMINSone grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue -9%
- CCCARREFOUR COMMUNAUTAIRE DE CHIBOUGAMAUone grant, 2023 · C$300
- CDCANOÉ DE L'ESPOIRone grant, 2022 · C$200 · revenue -42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE FELLOWSHIPS OF EVANGELICAL BAPTISTE CHURCH IN CANADA ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION D'EGLISE EVANGELIQUE AU QUEBEC ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE ÉVANGÉLIQUE BAPTISTE DES ETCHEMINS ↗
- Who funds L'ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE DES GÉEDÉONS AU CANAA ↗
- Who funds CAMP PATMOS DES ÉGLISES ÉVANGÉLIQUES BAPTISTES DU QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds CANOÉ DE L'ESPOIR ↗
- Who funds FONDATION BARNABAS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Église Nouvel Horizon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.