Ottawa, ON · Charitable organization
Eglise Evangelique Baptiste D'Ottawa
évangelisation services missionnaires
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNION DES ÉGLISES BAPTISTES FRANCOPHONES AU CANADA | C$10,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +99% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UDUnion des Églises Baptistes Francophones au Canada8× · 2017–2024 · C$245k · revenue +35%
- ACAssemblée Chrétienne Évangélique d'Ottawa3× · 2017–2019 · C$9k · revenue ×85
- BDBergers de l'Espoir6× · 2017–2022 · C$6k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- SGShareWord Global ( ancien nom: Gedeons Internationalone grant, 2023 · C$2k
- FIFONDATION IVRANCE ET EMMANUEL PIERREone grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue -27%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Union des Églises Baptistes Francophones au Canada ↗
- Who funds Assemblée Chrétienne Évangélique d'Ottawa ↗
- Who funds Bergers de l'Espoir ↗
- Who funds Assemblée Chrétienne Source de Vie ↗
- Who funds FONDATION IVRANCE ET EMMANUEL PIERRE ↗
- Who funds Life Action Ministries Association ↗
- Who funds THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.