Bromont, QC · Charitable organization
Eglise de la Victoire du Québec
Administrer et maintenir une église évangélique et proclamer l'évangile de jésus-christ
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA CHARITABLE FUND | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MEMINISTÈRES ENSEIGNEMOI3× · 2017–2019 · C$27k · revenue +665%
- TGTHE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA7× · 2017–2023 · C$10k · revenue +39%
- BFBRIDGE FOR PEACE3× · 2020–2023 · C$3k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- VOVOICE OF REVIVAL MINISTRIES ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2019 · C$13k · revenue -12%
- DPDONNER POUR AIDERgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue +58%
- ÉFÉGLISE FUSION VAILLANCOURTgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Faire connaitre la parole de dieu
Évangélisation de la communauté
Promouvoir la parole de dieu
Répandre l'évangile au pays et outre-mer (europe afrique) enseignement biblique par différents cours emissions de radio diffusion conférences
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Enseigner la parole de dieu au travers de la bible / évangélisation
Precher la parole de dieu
Culte évangélique biblique
Participation dans les conférences et séminaires évangéliques. enseignement et prédication de la bible. production de matériel d'enseignement évangélique.
Tenir et administrer une église évangélique
Glorifié dieu en selorant et priant dieu. edifier et enseigner la parole de dieu. propager l'evangile de jésus-christ ici et à travers le monde promouvoir la communion fraternelle exercer la bienfaisance
Organiser administrer et maintenir une eglise évangélique et proclamer l'évangile de jésus-christ à tous les hommes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christ En Action Evangelisation (C a E ) and the most unlike its peers is ÉGlise Fusion. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MINISTÈRES ENSEIGNEMOI ↗
- Who funds KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THIRD DAY WORDSHIP CENTRE OF LETHBRIDE ↗
- Who funds VOICE OF REVIVAL MINISTRIES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds GO & TELL THE WORLD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MINISTÈRE CROIX ET VIE ↗
- Who funds THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA CHARITABLE FUND ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN FARMERS - CANADA ↗
- Who funds DONNER POUR AIDER ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE FUSION VAILLANCOURT ↗
- Who funds TAKE CHARGE MINISTIRES ↗
- Who funds EGLISE SALUT ET DELIVRANCE DU CANADA INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIST EN ACTION EVANGELISATION ↗
- Who funds THE RIVER INTERNATIONAL CHURCH ↗
- Who funds CENTRE RÉVEIL INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds LES CHEVALIERS DE COLOMB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Le 1236 · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.