Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Église de Dieu Au Québec
Worship services prayers after pastor preaching word of god.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EGLISE DE DIEU O'BRIEN | C$8,000 |
| RENEWED HOPE CHURCH OF GOD | C$5,700 |
| LIVING WATERS CHURCH OF GOD | C$2,250 |
| ÉGLISE DE DIEU GARIZIM | C$520 |
| EGLISE DE DIEU MONTREAL NORD-OUEST | C$500 |
| ÉGLISE DE DIEU DU MONT SINAI | C$500 |
| ÉGLISE DE DIEU CENTRALE DE MONTREAL | C$350 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$9k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LWLIVING WATERS CHURCH OF GOD LTD.4× · 2019–2024 · C$14k · revenue +65%
- ÉLÉGLISE LIBRE PENTÉCÔTISTE BÉTHEL DE TROIS-RIVIÈRES4× · 2018–2021 · C$7k · revenue +50%
- ÉDÉGLISE DE DIEU DE LA DERNIÈRE HEURE2× · 2018–2020 · C$4k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- ÉDÉGLISE DDE DIEU LA SOURCEone grant, 2022 · C$8k · revenue +7%
- MFMIGHTY FORTRESS CHURCH OF GODone grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue +0%
- ÉRÉGLISE RENAISSANCEgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Soulager le pauvreté. enseigner l'evangile.
Culte du dimanche matin étude biblique et prière les mercredis évangélisation travail pastoral des membres et des visiteurs
Annoncer l'évangile de jésus-christ par l'enseignement et la prédication afin d'accomplir des oeuvres de bienfaisance
L'église évangélique baptiste l'eau vive
Église
Église chrétienne évangélique qui offre des cultes religieux principalement le dimanche de l'enseignement biblique et des oeuvres communautaires de bienfaisance.
Tenir et administrer une église évangélique
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is ÉGlise ÉVangÉLique MontrÉAl Nord-Ouest and the most unlike its peers is Mighty Fortress Church of God. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIVING WATERS CHURCH OF GOD LTD. ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE DDE DIEU LA SOURCE ↗
- Who funds EGLISE DE DIEU O'BRIEN ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE LIBRE PENTÉCÔTISTE BÉTHEL DE TROIS-RIVIÈRES ↗
- Who funds RENEWED HOPE CHURCH OF GOD ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE DE DIEU DE LA DERNIÈRE HEURE ↗
- Who funds THE STEPHEN WADE EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY FORTRESS CHURCH OF GOD ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE DE DIEU GARIZIM ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE DE DIEU DE ST-FRANÇOIS ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE RENAISSANCE ↗
- Who funds Cornerstone Church of God ↗
- Who funds EGLISE DE DIEU MONTREAL NORD-OUEST ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE DE DIEU DU MONT SINAI ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE DE DIEU SHALOM ADONAI ↗
- Who funds ÉGLISE DE DIEU CENTRALE DE MONTREAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Église de Dieu la Source the Source Church of God · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.