Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Rimouski, QC · Charitable organization

Église Connexion de Rimouski

1.

C$41k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
2
Regions reached
C$21k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$470
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$41k
C$19,542
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$635k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DISTRICT DU QUÉBEC DES ASSEMBLÉES DE PENTECÔTE DU CANADAC$21,326
LES ASSEMBLÉES DE LA PENTECÔTE DU CANADAC$19,542
ASSOCIATION DU CANCER DE L'EST DU QUÉBECC$470
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$162k · 4 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

C$162k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+61%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$470 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • DD
    DISTRICT DU QUÉBEC DES ASSEMBLÉES DE PENTECÔTE DU CANADA
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$103k · revenue +32%
  • LA
    LES ASSEMBLÉES DE LA PENTECÔTE DU CANADA
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$53k · revenue +22%
  • LI
    L'ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALES DE GÉDÉONS AU CANADA
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$5k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • AD
    ASSOCIATION DES FERMIERS CHRÉTIENS DU CANADAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue +46%
  • LL
    L'ÉCOLE L'EAU-VIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$1k · revenue +61%
  • DJ
    DÉFI JEUNESSE QUÉBEC
    one grant, 2018 · C$501

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDISTRICT DU QUÉBEC DES ASSEMBLÉES DE PENTECÔTE DU CANADA — C$103,036 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetLES ASSEMBLÉES DE LA PENTECÔTE DU CANADA — C$53,244 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetL'ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALES DE GÉDÉONS AU CANADA — C$4,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION DES FERMIERS CHRÉTIENS DU CANADA — C$2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPAIN DE VIE ÉVANGÉLISATION — C$1,050 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetL'ÉCOLE L'EAU-VIVE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION DU CANCER DE L'EST DU QUÉBEC — C$470 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
PayPal Giving Fund CanadaON3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 118839711:2022-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Église Connexion de Rimouski’s filings →