Laval, QC · Charitable organization
Eglise Armenienne Apostolique Sourp Kevork/Sourd Kevork Armenian Apostolic Church
Place of worship congregation parishes
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ÉGLISE ARMÉNIENNE SOURP HAGOP | C$6,000 |
| L'ECOLE ARMENIENNE SOURP HAGOP | C$2,890 |
| LA CROIX DE SECOURS ARMENIENNE DE LAVAL | C$1,100 |
| LA CROIX DE SECOURS ARMENIENNE DE LAVAL | C$800 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +82% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ÉAÉGLISE ARMÉNIENNE SOURP HAGOP8× · 2017–2024 · C$46k · revenue +48%
- APARMENIAN PRELACY OF CANADA2× · 2020–2021 · C$12k · revenue +456%
- LCLA CROIX DE SECOURS ARMENIENNE DE LAVAL4× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · C$5k
- FCFONDATION CENTRE DE CANCÉROLOGIEgraduated2× · 2017–2018 · C$3k · revenue +82%
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2019–2021 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Education religieuse armenienne catholique enseignement religieux a la communaute armenienne catholique du grand montreal assistance a lecole notre dame de nareg
Services religieux a toutes les semaines service de pastoral
Place of worship congregation parishes
Encourager activités musical dans les régions poursuivre et supporter des jeunes talentueux en musique et les guider à des niveaux plus élevés programme des plantation d'arbre et de épiculture
Promouvoir le culte et la pastorale célébration d'offices religieux initiation et administration de sacrements éducation de la foi catholique romaine.
L'organisme est une école privé pour la formation de niveau préscolaire primaire et secondaire (1 & 2) encadré par le ministère de l'éducation du québec. sa clientèle est constituée d'enfants provenant de la communauté arménienne.
Fournir des services religieux toutes semaines
Promouvoir l'éducation remettre des bourses d'études à des jeunes en fonction de leurs moyens financiers et de leur rendement scolaire; contribuer au soulagement de la pauvreté subventionner les dépenses liées à la réalisation d'une…
Promotion of armenian litterature & cultural heritage -promotion of musical talents by organizing concerts -charitable donations
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Croix De Secours Armenienne De Laval Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fondation Charles-Bruneau. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ÉGLISE ARMÉNIENNE SOURP HAGOP ↗
- Who funds ARMENIAN PRELACY OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds LA CROIX DE SECOURS ARMENIENNE DE LAVAL ↗
- Who funds LA FONDATION L'ECOLE ARMENIENNE SOURP HAGOP ↗
- Who funds FONDATION CENTRE DE CANCÉROLOGIE ↗
- Who funds ARS SHOUSHI ↗
- Who funds CENTRE D'ASSISTANCE MONDIALE ARMENIEN DE MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds EGLISE BON PASTEUR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Benevolent Committee of la Croix de Secours Armenienne Inc · Eglise Armenienne Sourp Hagop · La Fondation Famille Manoukdjoukhadjian/Manouk Djoukhadjian Family Foundation · Dervishian Foundation · Pasdermajian Foundation Inc. - · La Croix de Secours Armenienne de Laval Inc · Armenian Medical Association of Quebec / Association Médicale Armenienne Du Québec · Centre D'Assistance Mondiale Armenien de Montreal · The Armenian Relief Society of Canada (A.R.S.) Foundation/Fondation de la Croix de Secours Armenienne Du Canada (A.R.S.)Du Ca Nada (A.R.S.) · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.