Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Edmonton, AB · Charitable organization

Edmonton Viets Association

1) provide orientation re-settlement service to vietnamese refugees & immigrants; 2) provide counselling services to vietnamese youth seniors and widows; 3) provide community meeting and recreation/fitness facilities; 4) provide education seminars and scholarships for vietnamese.

C$500
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$500
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$447k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN OF VIETNAM BENEVOLENT FOUNDATIONC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

11%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$6k · 3 repeat orgsC$46k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against -28% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

C$6k
C$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
-28%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • GG
    GENEROUSLY GIVING BACK
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$2k · revenue +54%
  • CO
    CHILDREN OF VIETNAM BENEVOLENT FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2023 · C$2k · revenue +106%
  • MO
    MARGUERITE OF UNIVERSAL CHARITY SOCIETY
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$1k · revenue -6%

Funded once

  • CR
    CANADIAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2017 · C$35k · revenue -28%
  • CV
    CALGARY VIETNAMESE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$10k · revenue -69%
  • QO
    Queen of Martyrsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +66%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$35,221 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALGARY VIETNAMESE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGENEROUSLY GIVING BACK — C$2,200 over 3y, 14% of budgetCHILDREN OF VIETNAM BENEVOLENT FOUNDATION — C$2,180 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMARGUERITE OF UNIVERSAL CHARITY SOCIETY — C$1,300 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetQueen of Martyrs — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-04-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under community resource.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 107283285:2023-04-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Edmonton Viets Association’s filings →