Skip to content

Cranbrook, BC · Public foundation

Echoridge Education Foundation

To solicit and receive gifts, bequests, trusts, funds and property and beneficially, of as a trustee or agent, to hold, invest, develop, manage, accumulate and administer funds and property for the purpose of disbursing fundsand property exclusively to registered charities and qualified donees under the provisions of the Income Tax Act.

C$430k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
2
Regions reached
C$44k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$44,445
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$443k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vancouver General HospitalC$44,445
Southern Alberta Institute of TechnologyC$44,445
Medicine Hat CollegeC$44,445
College of the RockiesC$44,445
University of British ColumbiaC$44,445
University of AlbertaC$44,445
University of the Fraser ValleyC$44,445
University of LethbridgeC$44,445
University of CalgaryC$44,445
Individual grant recipientC$30,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$161k · 3 repeat orgsC$297k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

C$161k
C$297k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$297k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Lethbridge
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$54k · revenue +7%
  • UO
    University of Calgary
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$54k · revenue +27%
  • UO
    University of the Fraser Valley
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$52k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • MH
    Medicine Hat College
    one grant, 2018 · C$44k · revenue +10%
  • UO
    University of Albertagraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$44k · revenue ×1,016
  • CO
    College of the Rockies
    one grant, 2018 · C$44k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Victoria

The University of Victoria is a comprehensive research university offering a wide range of undergraduate graduate and continuing studies programs.

—
2
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
3
Board of Governors of the Banff Centre

The Banff Centre operates under the authority of the Post-Secondary Learning Act (Statutes of Alberta 2003 Chapter P-19.5). The Centre provides the public with the opportunity to access a broad range of learning experiences.

—
4
The University of Manitoba

The University of Manitoba provides post-secondary education to undergraduate graduate and professional students. The University also conducts research in a broad array of academic disciplines. There are numerous educational and research…

—
5
University of Northern British Columbia

Provide post secondary education and research in the following 1) natural resources 2) environmental studies 3) business 4) science 5) health and human science 6) arts 7) civil and environmental engineering 8) graduate studies

—
6
Alberta University of the Arts

Post-secondary education in the field of visual art and design. alberta university of the arts (auarts) provides bachelor of fine arts bachelor of design and masters of fine arts programs.

—
7
Thompson Rivers University

Thompson Rivers University operates as an accredited Post Secondary University offering a variety of undergraduate and masters degrees as well as a variety of diplomas certificates and continuing education courses.

—
8
British Columbia Institute of Technology

BCIT is a public polytechnic institute that operates across five campuses located in the Metro Vancouver region. BCIT provides post secondary education to nearly 50 000 students in subjects ranging from applied and natural sciences…

—
9
University of Prince Edward Island

Post-Secondary Education

—
10
The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Instruction and research in a university.

—
11
Brock University

Teaching and Research in broadly based undergraduate and graduate education programs including professional and interdisciplinary programs. The University provides education programs across seven faculties: Applied Health Sciences Business…

—
12
University of Ottawa / UniversitÉ D'ottawa

The university of ottawa offers post-secondary education.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of the Fraser Valley and the most unlike its peers is Medicine Hat College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Lethbridge — C$54,445 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Calgary — C$54,445 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of the Fraser Valley — C$52,445 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMedicine Hat College — C$44,445 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Alberta — C$44,445 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetUniversity of British Columbia — C$44,445 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Alberta Institute of Technology — C$44,445 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVancouver General Hospital — C$44,445 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enactus CanadaON8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enactus Canada · The Calgary Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-02-28, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation.

Source object 816075691:2018-02-28 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Echoridge Education’s filings →