Eaglesham, AB · Charitable organization
Eaglesham Community Church
Worship services are held weekly.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Alberta Parkland District | C$4,400 |
| Refresh Ministries | C$4,300 |
| Evangelical Free Church Of Canada | C$2,600 |
| David Thompson Bible Camp | C$2,200 |
| Desert Stream | C$2,200 |
| Safe Care | C$2,200 |
| Samaritan's Purse | C$2,200 |
| Mission Aviation Fellowship | C$2,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$22k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- APAlberta Parkland District5× · 2019–2023 · C$21k · revenue +23%
- RMREFRESH MINISTRIES7× · 2017–2023 · C$17k · revenue +53%
- EFEVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CANADA7× · 2017–2023 · C$16k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- DTDAVID THOMPSON BIBLE CAMPone grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -23%
- MAMISSIONS AVIATION FELLOWSHIPone grant, 2018 · C$2k
- MAMission Aviation Fellowshipone grant, 2017 · C$2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
Share the Gospel within and outside of Canada through church events and outreach.
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
Provide leadership conferences training and church planting support in developing countries. Also to provide spiritual life and evangelism conferences in Canada as well as in first nations church community
Outreach conferences leadership development sharing the gospel
Missionary training -bible studies
Teaching at conferences seminars retreats ywam schools and missions throughout the world.
Evangelism discipleship preaching liturgical celebrations
Evangelism Teaching Preaching Church Ministry Home Ministry Conferences Workshops Community Outreach Young Adult Ministries
To bring Christianity to places that have not been reached as of yet and to train young people to do the same.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Evangelical Free Church of Canada - Eglise Evangelique Libre De Canada and the most unlike its peers is Desert Streams Healing Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Alberta Parkland District ↗
- Who funds REFRESH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds SAFE CARE ↗
- Who funds MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds CHRISTAR INTERNATIONAL MISSION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds DESERT STREAM ↗
- Who funds DAVID THOMPSON BIBLE CAMP ↗
- Who funds BEAR LAKE BIBLE CAMP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Clairmont Community Church · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.