Skip to content
Canadian charities

Kenilworth, ON · Charitable organization

Eagles' Nest Christian Ministries of Arthur

1.

C$550
Granted FY2018
4
Grants FY2018
2
Regions reached
C$250
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$100
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$86
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD LIFE CENTREC$250
OPERATION SMITH CANADAC$100
KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIESC$100
HIGHLANDS YOUTH FOR CHRISTC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2k · 4 repeat orgsC$275 to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +123% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

C$2k
C$275

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+123%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WORLD LIFE CENTRE
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$850 · revenue +395%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE CANADA
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$650 · revenue +123%
  • KC
    KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$400 · revenue -20%

Funded once

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$150 · revenue +26%
  • MV
    MISSIONARY VENTURESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$100 · revenue +81%
  • OD
    OUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES CANADAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$25 · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORLD LIFE CENTRE — C$850 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetOPERATION SMILE CANADA — C$650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLANDS YOUTH FOR CHRIST — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSIONARY VENTURES — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES CANADA — C$25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2022) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 862802238:2018-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Eagles' Nest Christian Ministries of Arthur’s filings →