Toronto, ON · Private foundation
Eaglecom Foundation
In fy2024 EAGLECOM FOUNDATION continued to provide grants to upendo friends school (an unqualified donee with whom we have a draft agency agreement).
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k11 grants · C$83k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$45k
- C$50k–250k3 grants · C$263k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | C$125,000 |
| RWANDA PREFER SOCIETY | C$82,500 |
| THE AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION CANADA | C$55,000 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$23,000 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$21,500 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$7,500 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$7,500 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$7,500 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$7,500 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$7,500 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$7,500 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$7,500 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$7,500 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$7,500 |
| UPENDO FRIENDS SCHOOL | C$7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 76% of grant dollars (C$793k). The 24% that went abroad (C$249k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 24% of all-years giving (C$249k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +112% since the first grant, against +82% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- RPRWANDA PREFER SOCIETY5× · 2020–2024 · C$213k · revenue +213% · 46% of their budget
- TATHE AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION CANADA4× · 2021–2024 · C$120k · revenue +112%
- MCMSF Canada5× · 2018–2022 · C$85k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- UUNHCRone grant, 2018 · C$25k
- BSBC SPCAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$21k · revenue +82%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · C$10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.