Dundas, NB · Charitable organization
Dundas United Baptist Church
Worship services Sunday School Junior church community fellowship luncheons men's breakfast and youth group.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Canadian Baptist Ministries | C$630 |
| Radio Bible Class | C$600 |
| Canadian Baptists of Atlantic Canada | C$500 |
| Salvation Army | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$730 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- RBRadio Bible Class8× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +37%
- CUCrandall University3× · 2017–2021 · C$2k · revenue +219%
- CWCamp Wildwood3× · 2017–2019 · C$2k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- HHHarvest Housegraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$80 · revenue +267%
- PRPregnancy Resource Centreone grant, 2017 · C$60 · revenue +5%
- CFCrossroads For Womenone grant, 2017 · C$60
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The primary mission or purpose of Acadia Divinity College is to prepare ministers missionaries and other religious workers for Christian Service by providing theological education and training for specific forms of ministry affiliated or…
Christian University Education
Kingswood University is accredited through the Commission on Accreditation of the Association for Biblical Higher Education (ABHE) and provides a number of educational options including 3-4 year baccalaureate degrees focused on vocational…
Organismes missionnaires et propagation de l'évangile
Social outreach religious fellowship and auxiliary organizations missionary organizations evangelism
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
Christian Reformed World Missions is the international evangelism ministry of the Christian Reformed Church. Activities include evangelism, discipleship, and missions programs around the world.
Conducts missionary work in the developing countries
Christian religious and missionary services
Post-secondary Bible Institute with in depth Bible instruction and Christian ministry service training; Language School teaching French as a Second Language primarily to missionaries to French-speaking countries; Summer and Winter Bible…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Baptists of Atlantic Canada and the most unlike its peers is Crandall University Université Crandall. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.