Skip to content

Orleans, ON · Charitable organization

Dove Ministries Malaysia

*send missionary teams within canada and instructors to build up the christian faith of the community and the nations.

C$100
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$100
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$100
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$63k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LILY OF THE VALLEY MINISTRIESC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$10k · 7 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

C$10k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-18%
+43%

Still filing today

86%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PT
    Peace Tower Church
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$3k
  • LO
    LILY OF THE VALLEY
    5× · 2018–2024 · C$2k
  • CC
    CANAAN CHURCH
    3× · 2018–2022 · C$1k · revenue -41%

Funded once

  • LO
    LILY OF THE VALLEY
    one grant, 2019 · C$600
  • O(
    OASIS (THE OASIS)
    one grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue -63%
  • HC
    HARVEST CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · C$500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tree of Life

Prayer meetings weekly worship sunday school

—
2
Fountain of Power Ministries

Bible studies on wednesday and friday worship services and evangelistic outreach program

—
3
Outlook Christian Fellowship

Church services bible studies

—
4
Church On the Rock International Ministries

Sunday church services prayer meeting life group bible study retreats and sunday school

—
5
Fountain of Truth Ministries

Evangelistic services bible studies prayer services

—
6
Light and Life International Ministries

Weekly worship services online weekly ministries in group settings training and discipline sunday school for adults and chldren weekly praying meetings

—
7
Victory Now Church

Worship services sunday school bible studies outreach

—
8
Portal of Glory Christian Ministries International

Religious services sunday school for children adult bible studies. missionary outreach prayer services and spiritual counselling

—
9
Harvest Time International Ministries

Bible studies prayer meetings

—
10
Gospel Light Chapel

Weekly worship services paoc-missions evangelism-proclaming the gospel weekly bible study

—
11
Gospel Takeover Ministries Inc.

Bible study prayer meeting outreach

—
12
Mosaic Mission

Regular worship services bible studies prayer meetings revival meetings and fellowship.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peace Tower Church and the most unlike its peers is Lily of the Valley Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLILY OF THE VALLEY — C$2,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetCANAAN CHURCH — C$1,400 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetMY CHURCH (WAS HILLSONG CHURCH PARTIALLY IN 2019 AND RESUMED — C$1,050 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN DOOR FELLOWSHIP OF ELIZABETHTOWN-KITLEY INC — C$900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPEACE TOWER CHURCH — C$900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOWER TO CHANGE — C$500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOASIS (THE OASIS) — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREVIVE NATIONS — C$450 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Canadahelps CanadonON1.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 833774276:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Dove Ministries Malaysia’s filings →