Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Sarnia, ON · Charitable organization

Diocesan Commission on Missions Diocese of London

To coordinate the pontifical mission societies (canada) in the diocese of london.

C$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$41k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$41k
C$2,000
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$74k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROPOGATION OF THE FAITH AND ST PETER...C$40,726
DIOCESE OF WHITEHORSEC$2,000
CANADIAN CATHOLIC ORGANIZATION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND PEACEC$1,447
GHANA NATIVE ASSISTANCE GROUP INC.C$1,072
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$699k · 15 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -4% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

C$699k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
-13%

Still filing today

87%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CATHOLIC MISSIONS IN CANADA
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$8k · revenue +10%
  • HF
    HOMES FOR HOPE EL SALVADOR
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$6k · revenue +17%
  • SA
    SAVE A FAMILY PLAN
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$4k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • CM
    COMBONI MISSIONARIES
    one grant, 2020 · C$680
  • GN
    GHANA NATIVE ASSISTANCEGRPUP (CANADA)
    one grant, 2021 · C$625
  • CO
    CHALICE OF CANADA
    one grant, 2020 · C$500 · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Missionary Association of the Sisters of the Child Jesus

Support Communities in other countries

—
2
Les Missions Des Soeurs Missionnaires Du Christ-Roi

Missions chez les peuples non-chrétiens au congo en haiti en côte d'ivoire au philippines et au bénin dont les fins sont la religion la charité l'éducation et le bien-être.

—
3
K of C Foreign Mission Fund Inc.

Providing financial assistance for the education of priests and religious (sisters) in the third world countries.

—
4
Volunteer International Christian Service of the Holy Ghost

We continue to assist canadians in understanding their role in the developing world as we recruit and send out professionally and technically trained canadian women and men volunteers to serve overseas. we receive requests for personnel…

—
5
C.Pp.S. Mission Projects

Relief of poverty advancement of religion in tanzania east africa; construction and operation of schools; provision of safe water to people.

—
6
Franciscan Missionary Union

Support children nutrition projects in congo and rwanda support to poor clare and friars training centre in madagascar support mission works in the philippines

—
7
Sisters of Our Lady of the Missions Inc.

Pastoral work religious education visitation of people who are sick aged imprisoned work with people with disabilities refugees women community development programs in peru bolivia philippines work with economically disadvantaged…

—
8
Partners International Canada

Partners International-Christian Nationals Evangelism Mission works on an ongoing basis with local indigenous partner ministries around the world to plant Christian churches to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ. In many of those contexts…

—
9
AngelOne Canada

Conducts missionary work in the developing countries

—
10
Latin America Mission (Canada) Inc.

Maintained various mission ministries including church planting evangelism child care theological education food distribution and disaster relief efforts working primarily in bolivia brazil columbia costa rica guatemala honduras nicaragua…

—
11
Notre Dame Missions

In peru & paraguay ministry to the poor children & women - in kenya & ghana education & orphan outreach programs - in canada assist victims of trafficking & refugee relief

—
12
Missionaries of the Poor (Canada) Inc.

Ongoing programs: provide funds and supplies to missionaries of the poor in jamaica haiti idonesia kenya and phillippines. all funds are expended under the guidance of the organization's board of directors to provide food clothing medical…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Society for the Propagation of the Faith for Canada Eng and the most unlike its peers is Los Frutos Del Cafe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
8/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SOCIETY FOR THE PROPAGATION OF THE FAITH AND ST PETER TH — C$615,485 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetDIOCESE OF WHITEHORSE — C$33,170 over 7y, 56% of budgetCANADIAN CATHOLIC ORGANIZATION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND PEACE — C$11,477 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC MISSIONS IN CANADA — C$8,018 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR HOPE EL SALVADOR — C$5,768 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetCANADIAN JESUITS INTERNATIONAL — C$4,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE A FAMILY PLAN — C$3,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEART LINKS — C$2,100 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHOLY CHILDHOOD ASSOCIATION — C$1,237 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAID TO THE CHURCH IN NEED CANADA — C$1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGHANA NATIVE ASSISTANCE GROUP INC. — C$1,072 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMBONI MISSIONARIES — C$1,060 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHALICE OF CANADA — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS FRUSTOS DEL CAFE — C$500 over 1y, 16% of budgetGREY SISTERS DOMINICAN REPUBLIC — C$400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRCEC DIOCESE OF LONDON — C$320 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNORTHERN BRIDGE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDON BOSCO SOCIETY — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEPROSY OF CANADA — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM URSULINES — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Roman Catholic Ep…The Generalate of the…The Sisters of St. Jo…The Roman Catholic Ep…Roman Catholic Bishop…The Roman Catholic Bi…Grey Sisters of the I…Roman Catholic Archbi…The Roman Catholic Ep…Roman Catholic Episco…Ursuline Religious of…Congregation of the S…
The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of London in OntarioON12× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of London in Ontario · The Generalate of the Sisters of the Precious Blood · The Sisters of St. Joseph for the Diocese of Toronto in Upper Canada · The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of Hamilton in Ontario · Roman Catholic Bishop of Kamloops · The Roman Catholic Bishop of Nelson · Grey Sisters of the Immaculate Conception · Roman Catholic Archbishop of Vancouver · The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Ottawa-Cornwall · Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of Toronto in Canada · Ursuline Religious of the Diocese of London in Ontario · Congregation of the Sisters of St. Joseph in Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 118885581:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Diocesan Commission on Missions Diocese of London’s filings →