Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Maple Creek, SK · Charitable organization

Diamond C Cowboy Church Inc.

To provide church worship services to general public

C$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$500
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$90k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWSC$1,300
LIVING HOPE RANCHC$1,000
YOUTH WITH A MISSION FOUNDATIONC$500
CHINOOK SCHOOL DIVISIONC$500
SASKATCHEWAN MUSIC FESTIVAL ASSOCIATIONC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$5k · 7 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

C$5k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+3%

Still filing today

57%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    4× · 2017–2023 · C$2k · revenue +614%
  • IF
    INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWS
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +37%
  • YW
    YOUTH WITH A MISSION FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$600 · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAPLE CREEK FAMILY CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue +3%
  • MC
    MAPLE CREEK AND AREA SENIOR CITIZENS CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue -52%
  • JC
    Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedomsgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$200 · revenue +166%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dream Factory Foundation Inc.

Grant dreams to children with chronic or life-threatening illnesses.

—
2
The Maple Ridge Community Foundation

Providing grants to charitable organizations whose projects foster improvements in the quality of life of the citizens of maple ridge bc. provides scholarships and bursaries to graduating high school students in maple ridge b.c.

—
3
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Canada Fondation Rêves d'enfants Canada

Make-A-Wish creates life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses. We are on a quest to bring every eligible child's wish to life because a wish is an integral part of a child's treatment journey. Research shows children who…

—
4
Canadian Challenge Foundation
—
5
Johny Hein Memorial Fund

The charity awards scholarships for post-secondary education to students in the maple creek area of saskatchewan.

—
6
The Yellow Bus Foundation

The objective of the yellow bus foundation is to enrich the lives of children in canada living with chronic illness and/or serious medical conditions as well as providing enriching opportunities for disadvantaged youth.

—
7
The Canadian Maple Tree Foundation

To award grants to qualified grantees based on the recipient's objectives and the evolving charitable interests.

—
8
The Sunshine Foundation of Canada

Shine delivers dreams for young people ages 11-21 living with severe physical disabilities in canada

—
9
Alberta Dreams Foundation

The alberta dreams foundation is a not-for-profit society dedicated to fulfilling wishes of alberta children with chronic or life threatening illnesses.

—
10
The Matt Cook Charitable Foundation

The 'mcf care package' program is delivered to young adult in-patients undergoing cancer treatment. the matt cook foundation provides the program on an ongoing basis year-round and continues to receive positive feedback from both patient…

—
11
Creative Foundation Inc

Youth education and development

—
12
Cures for Kids Foundation
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedom and the most unlike its peers is Maple Creek and District Music Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY — C$2,215 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWS — C$1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAPLE CREEK FAMILY CHURCH — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMAPLE CREEK AND AREA SENIOR CITIZENS CLUB — C$1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLIVING HOPE RANCH — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUTH WITH A MISSION FOUNDATION — C$600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHINOOK SCHOOL DIVISION — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Wish Foundation — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJustice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOur Daily Bread Ministries Canada — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Push For Change Foundation — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSASKATCHEWAN MUSIC FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — C$100 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligneAB2.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-04-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 851199083:2024-04-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Diamond C Cowboy Church’s filings →