Skip to content

Ridgeway, ON · Charitable organization

Destination Church

Weekly religious services prayer meetings bible study pastoral care evangilism training + outreach donate funds to other qualified donees for missionary outreach + community activities outreach to the less fortunate

C$53k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$36k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$47k
C$1,269
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$179k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AQUEDUCT FOUNDATIONC$36,000
OPEN DOORS CANADAC$11,124
MISSION ONE ELEVENC$2,315
FOOD 4 KIDS NIAGARAC$1,269
TEEN CHALLENGEC$1,219
SOUTH NIAGARA LIFE MINISTRIESC$350
SAFE FAMILIESC$300
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$162k · 9 repeat orgsC$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

C$162k
C$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
0%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AQUEDUCT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$69k · revenue +6%
  • OD
    OPEN DOORS CANADA
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$43k · revenue +36%
  • SF
    SAFE FAMILIES NIAGARA
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$1k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • AF
    AQUADUCT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · C$10k
  • AF
    Aqueduct Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · C$8k
  • FN
    FOOD4KIDS NIAGARA
    one grant, 2022 · C$3k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Water Ambassadors Canada

Provide safe clean water in areas of the world where it is not available

—
2
Canada Safety Council/Conseil canadien de la sécurité

The Canada Safety Council is Canada's National Not-for-profit Safety Organization. Our mission is to lead the national effort to reduce death injurie and economic loss caused by accidents and health hazards in traffic at work at home and…

—
3
OneMeal Inc.

Prepares and gives out food packages to homeless people in toronto

—
4
Shelterbox Canada

ShelterBox Canada provides shelter essential items and technical assistance to help some of the world’s most vulnerable people recover and rebuild their homes after disaster. ShelterBox teams listen and adapt our support to the needs of…

—
5
FOOD4KIDS Toronto

Providing healthy food packages to children aged 4 to 13 in the Toronto region who face food insecurity on weekends and during summer months. The program targets participants with limited or no access to food at home ensuring they receive…

—
6
Teen Challenge of Central Canada Inc.

Provide drug alcohol & addiction counselling and rehabilitation programs in manitoba and ontario

—
7
One Global (Canada)

Educate the public on issues of and relating to extreme poverty and preventable disease with a focus on sub-Saharan Africa.

—
8
Habitat for Humanity Canada/Habitat Pour L'humanitÉ Canada

Habitat for Humanity Canada' brings communities together to help families build strength stability and independence through affordable homeownership. In fulfilling this mission we provide resources training and ongoing support to help…

—
9
Reaching Kids International Canada
—
10
Teen Missions in Canada Inc.

Establishment of missionary projects involving canadian teenagers throughout the world.

—
11
The Mission to Children

Distribute religious literature to encourage and nurture christian beliefs in canada. assist children internationally by maintaining a ministry for their physical educational character formation and spiritual needs. assist others in…

—
12
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teen Challenge Canada Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Kenneth Hagin Ministries of Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAQUEDUCT FOUNDATION — C$68,929 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOORS CANADA — C$43,155 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFOOD4KIDS NIAGARA — C$2,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMISSION ONE ELEVEN — C$2,315 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetKENNETH HAGIN MINISTRIES OF CANADA — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAFE FAMILIES NIAGARA — C$1,468 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSALVATION ARMY — C$1,328 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE — C$1,219 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SHARE OF NIAGARA FALLS — C$976 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSt. John Ambulance — C$800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDREAMS TO MEMORIES — C$272 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AQUEDUCT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOORS CANADA ↗
  • Who funds FOOD4KIDS NIAGARA ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ONE ELEVEN ↗
  • Who funds KENNETH HAGIN MINISTRIES OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FAMILIES NIAGARA ↗
  • Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SHARE OF NIAGARA FALLS ↗
  • Who funds St. John Ambulance ↗
  • Who funds DREAMS TO MEMORIES ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Canadahelps CanadonON1.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 862877735:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Destination Church’s filings →