Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Gatineau, QC · Charitable organization

Des Paniers de Noel Blitz Lions / Lions Christmas Baskets Blitz

Achat et distribution de paniers de provisions alimentaires aux families démunies de la région de buckingham masson-angers et l'ange-gardien.

C$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k7 grants · C$32k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$5,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$37k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RÉSIDENCE LE MONARQUEC$10,000
FONDATION SANTÉ DE PAPINEAUC$8,491
MAISON DE LA FAMILLE VALLÉE DE LA LIÈVREC$6,000
INSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE DE L'UNIVERSITÉ D'OTTAWAC$5,000
FONDATION SANTÉ GATINEAUC$5,000
PAROISE ST GRÉGOIRE DE NAZIANCEC$5,000
FONDATION MATHIEU-FROMENT-SAVOIEC$2,000
FONDATION SANTÉ VALLÉE GATINEAUC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$143k · 11 repeat orgsC$21k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

C$143k
C$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+22%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • RL
    RÉSODENCE LE MONARQUE
    2× · 2019–2024 · C$38k · revenue +61%
  • BA
    BANQUE ALIMENTAIRE DE LA LIÈVRE
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$34k · revenue +47%
  • MD
    MAISON DE LA FAMILLE VALLÉES-DE-LA-LIÈVE
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$25k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • DT
    DONNES TOI UNE CHANCE
    one grant, 2023 · C$6k · revenue +10%
  • CD
    CENTRE DE PÉDIATRIE SOCIAL DE GATINEAUgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +50%
  • MD
    MAISON DES GREFFÉS
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue +12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fondation Santé
—
2
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
3
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
4
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—
5
Fondation Santé de la Rouge

Le mandat de la fondation santé de la rouge est de développer avec la communauté des hautes-laurentides un partenariat qui lui permetta d'apporter aux intervenants les outils nécessaires pour offrir à la population de meilleurs soins…

—
6
Fondation De L'hopital Montfort

Recueillir les fonds nécessaires au soutien de l'innovation et du développement des services et des soins intégrés au sein de l'hôpital montfort et de l'institut du savoir au bénéfice du patient et de ses proches.

—
7
Fondation De L'hotel-Dieu De Montmagny

Promouvoir encourager et soutenir les oeuvres hospitalières scientifiques et humanitaires poursuivies par l'hôpital de montmagny

—
8
Fondation de l'hôpital d'Argenteuil

Recevoir des dons ou legs pour les fins particulières du cmsss d'argenteuil dans le but d'aider d'établissement dans la réalisation de sa mission - organiser des campagnes de souscription et solliciter des dons en faveur du cmsss…

—
9
Centre France Mailhiot

D'assurer le bien-être des personnes atteintes de cancer et leurs proches

—
10
Fondation SantÉ De L'archipel

Soutenir financièrement les acquisitions d'équipements médicaux à la fine pointe de la technoligie de la sécurié du confort en faveur du centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux des îles.

—
11
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine

Établissement de courte durée offrant des soins médicaux aux enfants et au mères qui effectue de la recherche pour le traitement des mères et des enfants

—
12
Fondation 'La Maison Notre-Dame Du Saguenay'

Contribuer au développement des activités médicales de même qu'à la promotion de la recherche sous toutes ses formes dans la région du saguenay

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation santé vallée-de-la-gatineau and the most unlike its peers is Procure Alliance / Alliance Procure. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRÉSODENCE LE MONARQUE — C$38,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetBANQUE ALIMENTAIRE DE LA LIÈVRE — C$33,900 over 2y, 11% of budgetMAISON DE LA FAMILLE VALLÉES-DE-LA-LIÈVE — C$24,860 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetFONDATION SANTÉ GATINEAU — C$15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION SANTÉ DE PAPINEAU — C$9,491 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL GÉNÉRAL DE HAWKESBURY — C$6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDONNES TOI UNE CHANCE — C$5,800 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE DE L'UNIVERSITÉ D'OTTAWA — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAROISE ST GRÉGOIRE DE NAZIANCE — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFONDATION MIRA — C$4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINE — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION MATHIEU-FROMENT-SAVOIE — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE DE PÉDIATRIE SOCIAL DE GATINEAU — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAISON DES GREFFÉS — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE PROCURE — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIBROSE KYSTIQUE CANADA — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON QUÉBEC — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION SANTÉ VALLÉE GATINEAU — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fonds de Charite Club…United Way East Ontar…Fondation St-HubertFondation Philantra P…Centraide Du Grand Mo…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…Charitable Gift Funds…Aqueduct FoundationStrategic Charitable …CHIMP: Charitable Imp…United Way of Greater…My Tribute Gift Found…
Fonds de Charite Club Richelieu de BuckinghamQC9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fonds de Charite Club Richelieu de Buckingham · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Fondation St-Hubert · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Aqueduct Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · My Tribute Gift Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 890680747:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Des Paniers de Noel Blitz Lions / Lions Christmas Baskets Blitz’s filings →