Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Brandon, MB · Private foundation

Decker Charitable Trust

Operating a school church and related facilities at decker colony

C$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH SCIENCE CENTERC$2,500
HAMIOTA HEALTH CAREC$2,500
PRAIRIE MOUNTAIN HEALTHC$1,000
HELPING HANDS CENTREC$1,000
SALVATION ARMYC$1,000
SAMARITAN HOUSE MINISTRIESC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$155k · 13 repeat orgsC$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

C$155k
C$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+12%

Still filing today

92%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    Providence Christian Service
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$66k · revenue +6%
  • BR
    BRANDON REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$34k · revenue +14%
  • SL
    SHOAL LAKE MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$10k · revenue +54% · 75% of their budget

Funded once

  • BR
    BRANDON REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k · revenue +45%
  • HT
    HEART TEAM INC
    one grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue +12%
  • HD
    Hamiota District Health Centre Foundation Inc.graduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +396%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Battlefords Union Hospital Foundation Inc

Grants of funds are provided to the saskatchewan health authority to be applied to the purchase of specific medical capital equipment research education and patient care enhancements for the battlefords union hospital battlefords region…

—
2
South Country Health Care Foundation Inc

South country health care foundation raises money through donations and fund raising and subsequently grants funds to various capital projects in the south country area of saskatchewan on basis of needs.

—
3
South Huron Hospital Foundation

Raise funds for improvement of health care services in the area served by south huron hospital

—
4
Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc.

Hospitals of Regina Foundation Inc. provides funding through donations to the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) and other agencies to improve healthcare for the residents of Southern Saskatchewan. The donations assist these agencies in…

—
5
St. Marys Healthcare Foundation

To maintain a fund to enhance or improve patient services for st. marys memorial hospital. the foundation works with the community to raise funds for major renovations special projects equipment and education for st. marys memorial…

—
6
St. Paul & District Hospital Foundation

The St. Paul & District Hospital Foundation is managed by a board of Trustees whose responsibility is to coordinate utilize and manage donated funds. The donated funds are used to purchase equipment to enhance hospital care for the people…

—
7
Brant Community Healthcare System Foundation

Fund raised are for designated and capital projects and patient equipment for the brant community healthcare system brantford general hospital and the willett hospital sites

—
8
Southlake Health Foundation

Southlake regional health centre foundation provides funding to southlake regional health centre and to the southlake residential care village for capital improvements renovations the purchase of capital equipment and in support of…

—
9
St Paul's Hospital Foundation Inc

The funding received is provided to st. paul's hospital (grey nuns) of saskatoon which in turn funds various programs of the hospital such as education research spiritual care and other programs in support of the mission of sph. in…

—
10
Strait-Richmond Health Care Foundation

Purchase hospital equipment and fund programs.

—
11
Woodstock Hospital Foundation

The charity carried out its charitable purposes during the fiscal period by raising funds and investing such funds until they are distributed to the woodstock hospital for the purposes of buying new or replacing equipment.

—
12
Boreal Healthcare Foundation Inc.

To help provide funds for specialized equipment innovative patient care services and upgrading of facilities and replacement of out-dated equipment at the victoria hospital and any facilities within the relevant and applicable zones as…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Brandon Regional Health Centre Foundation Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Heart Team Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetProvidence Christian Service — C$65,800 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetBRANDON REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION — C$33,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHOAL LAKE MEDICAL CENTER — C$10,000 over 4y, 75% of budgetSALVATION ARMY — C$8,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE MINISTRIES — C$8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSILOAM MISSION — C$7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF BRANDON — C$5,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHEALTH SCIENCE CENTER — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDON REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHOCK TRAUMA AIR RESCUE SERVICE FOUNDATION — C$4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE — C$4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST BONIFACE HOSPITAL — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART TEAM INC — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHamiota District Health Centre Foundation Inc. — C$2,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetBaker Charitable Trust — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRACE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMGLE INC. — C$800 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetOAK BLUFF COLONY CHARITABLE TRUST — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRYSTAL SPRING CHARITABLE TRUST — C$300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cascade Charitable Tr…Spring Hill ColonyThe Cardinal Foundati…United Way Of Brandon…All Charities CampaignElm River Charitable …Sunnyside Charitable …Acadia ColonyNew Haven Charitable …Starlite Charitable T…Wellington West Found…Thomas Sill Foundatio…
Cascade Charitable TrustMB10.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cascade Charitable Trust · Spring Hill Colony · The Cardinal Foundation · United Way Of Brandon & District Inc. · All Charities Campaign · Elm River Charitable Trust · Sunnyside Charitable Trust · Acadia Colony · New Haven Charitable Trust · Starlite Charitable Trust · Wellington West Foundation Inc. · Thomas Sill Foundation Inc.

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under christianity.

Source object 889849394:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Decker’s filings →