Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

North York, ON · Private foundation

David Mansell and Naomi Rifkind Mansell Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to charitable organizations that are also registered charities under the income tax act (canada).

C$280k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$30k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$250k
C$86,000
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTOC$100,000
CHABAD ON CAMPUS CANADAC$86,000
ASSOCIATED HEBREW SCHOOLS OF TORONTOC$63,600
ANNE & MAX TANENBAUM COMMUNITY HEBREW ACADEMY OF TORONTOC$30,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.1M · 7 repeat orgsC$323k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

C$1.1M
C$293k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
0%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$518k · revenue +88%
  • CO
    CHABAD ON CAMPUS CANADA
    3× · 2018–2024 · C$184k · revenue +229% · 32% of their budget
  • SS
    Shaarel Shomaylm Congregation
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$65k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROHR CHABAD NDGgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$134k · revenue +160% · 33% of their budget
  • MC
    MIZRACHI CANADA
    one grant, 2023 · C$50k · revenue -11%
  • IM
    ISRAEL MAGEN FUND OF CANADA
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k · revenue 0% · 73% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto

The jewish foundation of greater toronto receives manages and invests funds as well as disburses grants to qualified donees. using a research-driven approach the jewish foundation of greater toronto strategically distributes to community…

—
2
Jewish Learning Initiative on Campus (Jlic) Canada

Programs in which primarily university students are able to acquire and cultivate jewish learning wisdom throught and culture

—
3
The Canadian Jewish Educational Fund

The charity provides scholarships and promotes the study of judaism carrying out educational programming both in and out of schools, intensive study workshops and teacher training in biblical studies.

—
4
Hillel Ontario

The charity provides cultural programs for jewish students on university campuses located throughout the toronto area the gta and the province of ontario. the charity works to instill religious and cultural values to students on campus.

—
5
Talmudical Academy of Toronto Mishkan HaTorah Charitable Trust

Operate a school to provide religious education in accordance with orthodox jewish tradition.

—
6
The Canadian Friends of Mercaz Hatorah

Funds provided for students desirous of studying advanced Talmudic and Torah law at Mercaz Hatorah Rabbinical Seminary in Jerusalem and other similar institutions.

—
7
Canadian Friends of Mesivta Torah V'yirah of U T a

Provide scholarships and assistance to needy students

—
8
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
9
The Toronto Jewish Film Foundation

The charity stages a large film festival and educates the public through this fesitval discussion and lectures as to the jewish history language society culture and religion.

—
10
Canadian Friends of Yeshivat Lev Hatorah

To advance religion by providing financial assistance to jewish boys and men interested in pursuing high religious studies.

—
11
Halacha Institute of Toronto

1. to provide courses seminars and workshops to explain and identify the principals of jewish law 2. telephone helpline 3. consulting the jewish business owners to ensure that their businesses adhere to jewish law 4. ongoing study group…

—
12
Canadian Friends of the Institute 0HOLEI Torah

The charity provides scholarship to needy students

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto and the most unlike its peers is Shaarei Shomayim Congregation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO — C$518,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD ON CAMPUS CANADA — C$184,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetASSOCIATED HEBREW SCHOOLS OF TORONTO — C$165,447 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetROHR CHABAD NDG — C$134,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Toronto — C$70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShaarel Shomaylm Congregation — C$64,995 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetANNE & MAX TANENBAUM COMMUNITY HEBREW ACADEMY OF TORONTO — C$60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIZRACHI CANADA — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVE'AHAVTA — C$40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetISRAEL MAGEN FUND OF CANADA — C$20,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetThe Canadian Zionist Cultural Association (CZCA) — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCANADIAN FOUNDATION FOR THE EDUCATION AND WELFARE OF THE JEW — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED HATZALAH CANADA — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe House Toronto — C$15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetJewish Family and Child Service of Greater Toronto — C$12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIsrael Cancer Research Fund — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Jewish Foundation of …Zichron Binyomin Char…Rayjo Charitable TrustThe Emmet FoundationBessin Family Foundat…Mizrachi Organization…The Estaron FoundationUnited Jewish Appeal …The Friedberg Charita…My Charity FundConam Charitable Foun…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC10.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · The Emmet Foundation · Bessin Family Foundation · Mizrachi Organization Of Canada · The Estaron Foundation · United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · Conam Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 834268773:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on David Mansell and Naomi Rifkind Mansell’s filings →