Dauphin, MB · Public foundation
Dauphin & District Community Foundation Inc
The dauphin & district foundation continues it's efforts to raise endowment funds and give out grants to worthwhile organizations
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k15 grants · C$66k
- C$10k–50k4 grants · C$102k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOUNTAINVIEW SCHOOL DIVISION | C$49,385 |
| GILBERT PLAINS MUNICIPALITY | C$21,412 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$19,467 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$11,309 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$8,816 |
| FORT DAUPHIN MUSEUM | C$8,285 |
| DAUPHIN MULTI PURPOSE SENIOR CENTRE INC | C$8,250 |
| DAUPHIN RECREATION SERVICES | C$8,218 |
| CANADA'A NATIONAL UKRAINIAN FESTIVAL INC | C$8,000 |
| REGIONAL CONNECTIONS | C$7,450 |
| DAUPHIN ALLIED ARTS COUNCIL INC | C$5,171 |
| UKRAINIAN FOLK ARTS CENTRE | C$4,959 |
| MICHIF CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES INC | C$1,710 |
| ZIRKA DANCE ENSEMBLE INC | C$1,500 |
| DAUPHIN FIRST UNITED CHURCH | C$1,371 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$20k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- DRDAUPHIN RECREATION SERVICES7× · 2018–2024 · C$163k · revenue +87%
- MVMOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL DIVISION4× · 2019–2022 · C$49k · revenue +12%
- DDDAUPHIN & DISTRICT HANDIVAN ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2021–2023 · C$37k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- DDDAUPHIN & DISTRICT ALLIED ARTS COUNCILone grant, 2017 · C$22k
- RMRURAL MIUNICIPALITY OF DAUPHINone grant, 2023 · C$17k
- DCDAUPHIN CHURCH OF CHRIST 2004 INCone grant, 2023 · C$12k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide Child Day Care services for children ages 5 to 12
Daycare services
Day care services
The dauphin & district foundation continues it's efforts to raise endowment funds and give out grants to worthwhile organizations
Provide daycare services
Childcare program for infants toddlers and preschool aged children
Child care/daycare
Provided day care services
Subsidized child daycare facility
Operate year-round daycare.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dauphin and District Community Food Bank Society Inc. and the most unlike its peers is The Mountain View School Division. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DAUPHIN RECREATION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL DIVISION ↗
- Who funds DAUPHIN & DISTRICT HANDIVAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds DAUPHIN FRIENDSHIP CENTRE INC ↗
- Who funds DAUPHIN ALLIED ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ALMOST NEW STORE ↗
- Who funds FORT DAUPHIN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN FOLK ARTS CENTRE ↗
- Who funds DAUPHIN FIRST UNITED CHURCH ↗
- Who funds CANADA'A NATIONAL UKRAINIAN FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds DAUPHIN CHURCH OF CHRIST 2004 INC ↗
- Who funds PARKLAND HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PARKLAND CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds DAUPHIN MULTI PURPOSE SENIOR CENTRE INC ↗
- Who funds PARKLAND ASSISTED LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds DAUPHIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAUPHIN & DISTRICT COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DAUPHIN MAGICAL HORIZONS DAYCARE ↗
- Who funds PETER PAN DAY NURSERY INC ↗
- Who funds TINKER BELL NURSERY SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MANITOBA SWIMABILITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: All Charities Campaign · Dauphin First Baptist Church Inc. · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.