Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Vancouver, BC · Charitable organization

Cw Asia Fund Foundation

Cwaff helps to relieve poverty in developing nations by providing food and other basic necessaries of life; to relieve poverty by providing life skills training to street children; to promote health by providing the impoverished with basic health care services and products that prevent and manage threats to health.

C$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$25,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAKING IT GLOBALC$25,000
BC CHILDREN'S HEARING AND SPEECHC$10,000
02Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTAKING IT GLOBAL — C$33,333 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBC CHILDREN'S HEARING AND SPEECH — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARTS UMBRELLA — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVANCOUVER FIREFIGHTERS CHARITY — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHOR LEONI CHORAL SOCIETY — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOONG CHING LING CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$2,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE ELK'S RECREATION CHILDREN'S CAMP SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLU — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nicola Wealth Private…Vancouver FoundationUnited Way British Co…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…Charitable Gift Funds…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Nicola Wealth Private Giving FoundationBC8.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nicola Wealth Private Giving Foundation · Vancouver Foundation · United Way British Columbia · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under supportive health care.

Source object 830557831:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Cw Asia’s filings →