Medicine Hat, AB · Charitable organization
Crossroads Church of the Christian and Missionary Alliance
Worship services; home bible studies; visitation of the ill and bereaved; counselling; youth; sunday school; weekly youth group
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k5 grants · C$8k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$16k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY ALLIANCE OF CANADA | C$16,300 |
| CHARLES SIMEON TRUST OF CANADA | C$4,500 |
| MILLAR COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE | C$1,000 |
| THE GREAT COMMISSION FOUNDATION | C$750 |
| WHISPERING PINES FELLOWSHIP CENTRE AND CAMP | C$750 |
| PRAIRIE GLEANERS SOCIETY | C$750 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CMCHRISTIAN MISSIONARY ALLIANCE OF CANADA7× · 2017–2024 · C$111k · revenue +12%
- CSCHARLES SIMEON TRUST OF CANADA4× · 2020–2024 · C$29k · revenue +154%
- MCMILLAR COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE3× · 2021–2024 · C$6k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- TMTHE MUSTARD SEED FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · C$4k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Development production and distribution of educational resources specifically for those who know little or nothing about the Bible but who want to know more. Training (through seminars conducted in homes churches and schools) of…
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
The mission of global scholars canada is to identify develop send equip and support missional christian academics for work primarily in open enrollment post secondary institutions around the world with the objective to inspire and…
Promote the word of god and to aid in spreading the gospel of jesus christ to the end of the earth. we challenge and assist people to minister to the unreached. we participate in conferences at churches bible colleges and universities for…
Provide academic training for the ministry of the gospel
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
To advance the christian faith and assist and support the local church across canada in their task of fulfilling the great commission of jesus christ through composing recording publishing and performing innovative and theologically sound…
Tyndale University is dedicated to the pursuit of truth to excellence in teaching learning and research for the enriching of mind heart and character to serve the church and the world for the glory of God. Ongoing programs: 1) To provide a…
Missionary training -bible studies
We exist to preach and advance the teachings of the Christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines and observances by providing consultation instructional material curriculum development and best practices; and to propagate the…
The foundation's mandate is the advancement of christianity by long-term funding of direct and indirect programs of evangelization outreach both in canada and internationally.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Christian and Missionary Alliance in Canada/ L'alliance Chretienne Et Missionnaire Au Canada and the most unlike its peers is Prairie Gleaners Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY ALLIANCE OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds CHARLES SIMEON TRUST OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds MILLAR COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE ↗
- Who funds THE GOSPEL COALITION CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE MUSTARD SEED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WHISPERING PINES FELLOWSHIP CENTRE AND CAMP ↗
- Who funds THE GREAT COMMISSION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRAIRIE GLEANERS SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.