Hartington, ON · Charitable organization
Crimson River Gospel Music Association
Crimson river's purpose is to sing promote and advance the gospel of jesus christ both in canada and abroad.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLE LAKE FREE METHODIST CHURCH | C$50 |
| VERONA FREE METHODIST CHURCH | C$50 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$50 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HFHARROWSMITH FREE METHODIST CHURCH7× · 2017–2023 · C$710 · revenue +200%
- YWYOUTH WITH A MISSION3× · 2017–2019 · C$660 · revenue +20%
- GIGALCOM INTERNATIONAL4× · 2017–2020 · C$200 · revenue +24%
Funded once
- PPPHILADELPHA PAOCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$100 · revenue +71%
- AVALDERSGATE VILLAGEone grant, 2018 · C$100 · revenue +20%
- YWYOUTH WITH A MISSIONone grant, 2020 · C$100 · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Worship focus groups bible study vacation bible study youth groups
Youth conferences Worship services Leadership and Evangelism.
Christian radio broadcasts
Crosstalk ministries promotes christian education and evangelizing through conferences retreats and summer camping programs for youth and young adults. these include weekend retreats vacation bible school residential youth camps worship…
Offering programs that mobilize youth and young adults to promote christian faith and principles. the programs inculde summer missions with teens year round missions with young adults conferences for young leaders and various camps.
The church operates several different outreach programs: sunday morning services sunday school wednesday night bible study youth group singspirations dvbs mission work
Production of weekly radio broadcasts and sent to radio station for broadcasting on radio. transmitters internationally production of cd's to send stations and individuals as requested.
Preaching the gospel through broadcasting TV programs Printed publications Emergency Relief Media evangelism Campaigns
Sunday worship services sunday school youth group junior youth group weekly bible studies ladies outreach vacation bible school
Build equip and maintain radio broadcast stations in/for global communities. provide christian programming for radio stations. provision of humanitarian services for needy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Proverbs Gospel Music Association and the most unlike its peers is Aldersgate Homes Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HARROWSMITH FREE METHODIST CHURCH ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION ↗
- Who funds THE PROVERBS GOSPEL MUSIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GALCOM INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds UCB CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE GIDEONS ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHA PAOC ↗
- Who funds ALDERSGATE VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION ↗
- Who funds IVANHOE CAMP ↗
- Who funds VERONA PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLY ↗
- Who funds WESLEY ACRES INC. ↗
- Who funds PINE GROVE FREE METHODIST ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS CHRISTIAN COMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds COLE LAKE FREE METHODIST CHURCH ↗
- Who funds DESTINY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN RED CROSS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.